Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trends in volume and risk profiles of patients undergoing isolated surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Mori, Makoto; Bin Mahmood, Syed Usman; Geirsson, Arnar; Yun, James J; Cleman, Michael W; Forrest, John K; Mangi, Abeel A.
Afiliação
  • Mori M; Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Bin Mahmood SU; Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Geirsson A; Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Yun JJ; Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Cleman MW; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Forrest JK; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  • Mangi AA; Section of Cardiac Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(6): E337-E342, 2019 05 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30269424
BACKGROUND: Recent reports describe increases in the case volume of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) after centers establish a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) program. We investigate contemporary temporal trends in SAVR and TAVR case volumes and risk profiles at a high volume academic medical center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive evaluation of consecutive patients who underwent TAVR (n = 538) or SAVR (n = 657) in 2011-2016. The STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) for isolated SAVR was used to calculate PROM for both SAVR and TAVR patients. Patients were stratified based on STS PROM as follows: low risk (<4%), intermediate risk (4-8%), and high risk (≥8%). Temporal changes in patient risk-profile were characterized descriptively. RESULTS: Median STS PROM for the study period was 6.3% and 2.0% for TAVR and SAVR cohorts, respectively (P < 0.001). Since 2011, TAVR volume consistently increased, while SAVR volume increased initially, peaking in 2013 and steadily declined. The STS PROM for SAVR remained stable during the entire study period, while that for TAVR showed a steady decline. The proportions of intermediate and low STS PROM patients undergoing TAVR increased. Proportions of each risk category in SAVR cohort remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: SAVR volume increased initially but declined eventually following the implementation of TAVR program. The distribution of the STS PROM in TAVR cohort changed dramatically with increasing proportion of patients in lower risk categories. These findings suggest the converging patient populations in TAVR and SAVR, which may be associated with the decline in the overall SAVR volume.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Padrões de Prática Médica / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Padrões de Prática Médica / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article