Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Cost-Effectiveness of Aripiprazole Augmentation With Other "Next-Step" Depression Treatment Strategies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Yoon, Jean; Zisook, Sidney; Park, Angel; Johnson, Gary R; Scrymgeour, Alexandra; Mohamed, Somaia.
Afiliação
  • Yoon J; 795 Willow Rd, 152 MPD, Menlo Park, CA 94025. jean.yoon@va.gov.
  • Zisook S; Health Economics Resource Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA.
  • Park A; Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA.
  • Johnson GR; Department of General Internal Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Scrymgeour A; VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Mohamed S; UCSD School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 80(1)2018 12 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30695291
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the cost-effectiveness of 3 common alternate treatments for depression.

METHODS:

The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted as part of a randomized clinical trial, the Veterans Affairs Augmentation and Switching Treatments for Improving Depression Outcomes (VAST-D) trial, in which patients were randomized from December 2012 to May 2015 and followed for 12 weeks in 35 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Depression diagnosis was based on ICD-9 codes. Patients were randomized to standard antidepressant therapy augmented with aripiprazole, standard antidepressant therapy augmented with bupropion, or switch to bupropion. Remission was measured using the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinican Rated. Outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) comparing costs per remission and costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) with 12 weeks as the time horizon using the health care sector perspective.

RESULTS:

The mean age of participants enrolled in the trial (N = 1,522) was 54 years, and participants were predominantly male. The rate of remission at 12 weeks was highest for the aripiprazole augmentation arm (29%), followed by bupropion augmentation (27%), and lowest for switching to bupropion (22%). Switching to bupropion was strongly dominated by bupropion augmentation at an ICER of -$640/remission (95% CI, -$5,770 to $3,008). The ICER for the aripiprazole augmentation versus switching to bupropion was $1,074/remission (95% CI, $47 to $5,022), and the ICER for aripiprazole augmentation versus bupropion augmentation was $5,094/remission (95% CI, -$34,027 to $32,774). There were no significant differences in QALYs, mental health care costs, employment, or other work and social adjustment outcomes between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

In treatment of depression with less than optimal response, augmentation with either aripiprazole or bupropion was cost-effective relative to switching to bupropion. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01421342.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bupropiona / Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração / Depressão / Transtorno Depressivo Maior / Aripiprazol Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bupropiona / Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração / Depressão / Transtorno Depressivo Maior / Aripiprazol Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Psychiatry Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article