Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Continental drift? Do European clinical genetic testing laboratories have a patent problem?
Liddicoat, Johnathon; Liddell, Kathleen; McCarthy, Arlie H; Hogarth, Stuart; Aboy, Mateo; Nicol, Dianne; Patton, Simon; Hopkins, Michael M.
Afiliação
  • Liddicoat J; Faculty of Law, Centre for Law, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. jel68@cam.ac.uk.
  • Liddell K; Faculty of Law, Centre for Law, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • McCarthy AH; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Hogarth S; Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Aboy M; Faculty of Law, Centre for Law, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Nicol D; Faculty of Law, Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
  • Patton S; European Molecular Genetics Quality Network, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Hopkins MM; Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 27(7): 997-1007, 2019 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30846855
ABSTRACT
Recent US Supreme Court decisions have invalidated patent claims on isolated genomic DNA, and testing methods that applied medical correlations using conventional techniques. As a consequence, US genetic testing laboratories have a relatively low risk of infringing patents on naturally occurring DNA or methods for detecting genomic variants. In Europe, however, such claims remain patentable, and European laboratories risk infringing them. We report the results from a survey that collected data on the impact of patents on European genetic testing laboratories. The results indicate that the proportion of European laboratories that have refrained from providing associated testing services owing to patent protection has increased over the last decade (up from 7% in 2008 to 15% in 2017), and that the non-profit sector was particularly strongly affected (up from 4% in 2008 to 14% in 2017). We renew calls for more readily available legal support to help public sector laboratories deal with patent issues, but we do not recommend aligning European law with US law at present. Watchful monitoring is also recommended to ensure that patents do not become a greater hindrance for clinical genetic testing laboratories.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Decisões da Suprema Corte Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Hum Genet Assunto da revista: GENETICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Decisões da Suprema Corte Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Hum Genet Assunto da revista: GENETICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido