Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Toward the improvement of total nitrogen deposition budgets in the United States.
Walker, J T; Beachley, G; Amos, H M; Baron, J S; Bash, J; Baumgardner, R; Bell, M D; Benedict, K B; Chen, X; Clow, D W; Cole, A; Coughlin, J G; Cruz, K; Daly, R W; Decina, S M; Elliott, E M; Fenn, M E; Ganzeveld, L; Gebhart, K; Isil, S S; Kerschner, B M; Larson, R S; Lavery, T; Lear, G G; Macy, T; Mast, M A; Mishoe, K; Morris, K H; Padgett, P E; Pouyat, R V; Puchalski, M; Pye, H O T; Rea, A W; Rhodes, M F; Rogers, C M; Saylor, R; Scheffe, R; Schichtel, B A; Schwede, D B; Sexstone, G A; Sive, B C; Sosa Echeverría, R; Templer, P H; Thompson, T; Tong, D; Wetherbee, G A; Whitlow, T H; Wu, Z; Yu, Z; Zhang, L.
Afiliação
  • Walker JT; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States of America. Electronic address: walker.johnt@epa.gov.
  • Beachley G; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Amos HM; AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow hosted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Baron JS; U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
  • Bash J; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States of America.
  • Baumgardner R; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States of America.
  • Bell MD; National Park Service, Air Resources Division, Lakewood, CO, United States of America.
  • Benedict KB; Colorado State University, Department of Atmospheric Science, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
  • Chen X; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States of America.
  • Clow DW; U.S. Geological Survey, Colorado Water Science Center, Denver, CO, United States of America.
  • Cole A; Environment and Climate Change Canada, Air Quality Research Division, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Coughlin JG; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
  • Cruz K; U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Daly RW; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States of America.
  • Decina SM; University of California, Department of Chemistry, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
  • Elliott EM; University of Pittsburgh, Department of Geology & Environmental Science, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
  • Fenn ME; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside, CA, United States of America.
  • Ganzeveld L; Meteorology and Air Quality (MAQ), Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  • Gebhart K; National Park Service, Air Resources Division, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
  • Isil SS; Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc., Newberry, FL, United States of America.
  • Kerschner BM; Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, United States of America.
  • Larson RS; Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States of America.
  • Lavery T; Environmental Consultant, Cranston, RI, United States of America.
  • Lear GG; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Macy T; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Mast MA; U.S. Geological Survey, Colorado Water Science Center, Denver, CO, United States of America.
  • Mishoe K; Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc., Newberry, FL, United States of America.
  • Morris KH; National Park Service, Air Resources Division, Lakewood, CO, United States of America.
  • Padgett PE; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside, CA, United States of America.
  • Pouyat RV; U.S. Forest Service, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
  • Puchalski M; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Pye HOT; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States of America.
  • Rea AW; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States of America.
  • Rhodes MF; D&E Technical, Urbana, IL, United States of America.
  • Rogers CM; Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc., Newberry, FL, United States of America.
  • Saylor R; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States of America.
  • Scheffe R; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Durham, NC, United States of America.
  • Schichtel BA; National Park Service, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.
  • Schwede DB; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States of America.
  • Sexstone GA; U.S. Geological Survey, Colorado Water Science Center, Denver, CO, United States of America.
  • Sive BC; National Park Service, Air Resources Division, Lakewood, CO, United States of America.
  • Sosa Echeverría R; Centro de Ciencias de la Atmosfera, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico.
  • Templer PH; Boston University, Department of Biology, Boston, MA, United States of America.
  • Thompson T; AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow hosted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Tong D; George Mason University. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD, United States of America.
  • Wetherbee GA; U.S. Geological Survey, Hydrologic Networks Branch, Denver, CO, United States of America.
  • Whitlow TH; Cornell University, Department of Horticulture, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
  • Wu Z; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States of America.
  • Yu Z; University of Pittsburgh, Department of Geology & Environmental Science, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
  • Zhang L; Environment and Climate Change Canada, Air Quality Research Division, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sci Total Environ ; 691: 1328-1352, 2019 Nov 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31466212
ABSTRACT
Frameworks for limiting ecosystem exposure to excess nutrients and acidity require accurate and complete deposition budgets of reactive nitrogen (Nr). While much progress has been made in developing total Nr deposition budgets for the U.S., current budgets remain limited by key data and knowledge gaps. Analysis of National Atmospheric Deposition Program Total Deposition (NADP/TDep) data illustrates several aspects of current Nr deposition that motivate additional research. Averaged across the continental U.S., dry deposition contributes slightly more (55%) to total deposition than wet deposition and is the dominant process (>90%) over broad areas of the Southwest and other arid regions of the West. Lack of dry deposition measurements imposes a reliance on models, resulting in a much higher degree of uncertainty relative to wet deposition which is routinely measured. As nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions continue to decline, reduced forms of inorganic nitrogen (NHx = NH3 + NH4+) now contribute >50% of total Nr deposition over large areas of the U.S. Expanded monitoring and additional process-level research are needed to better understand NHx deposition, its contribution to total Nr deposition budgets, and the processes by which reduced N deposits to ecosystems. Urban and suburban areas are hotspots where routine monitoring of oxidized and reduced Nr deposition is needed. Finally, deposition budgets have incomplete information about the speciation of atmospheric nitrogen; monitoring networks do not capture important forms of Nr such as organic nitrogen. Building on these themes, we detail the state of the science of Nr deposition budgets in the U.S. and highlight research priorities to improve deposition budgets in terms of monitoring and flux measurements, leaf- to regional-scale modeling, source apportionment, and characterization of deposition trends and patterns.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article