Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Field Performance of Two Methods for Detection of Poliovirus in Wastewater Samples, Mexico 2016-2017.
Estívariz, Concepción F; Pérez-Sánchez, Elda E; Bahena, Anita; Burns, Cara C; Gary, Howard E; García-Lozano, Herlinda; Rey-Benito, Gloria; Peñaranda, Silvia; Castillo-Montufar, Katy V; Nava-Acosta, Raúl S; Meschke, John Scott; Oberste, M Steven; Lopez-Martínez, Irma; Díaz-Quiñonez, José A.
Afiliação
  • Estívariz CF; Global Immunization Division, Global Health Center, Centers for Control Disease and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. cge3@cdc.gov.
  • Pérez-Sánchez EE; Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológico, Francisco de P. Miranda 177, Lomas de Plateros-Alvaro Obregon, Ciudad De México, 01480, Mexico.
  • Bahena A; Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Ciudad de México, Montes Urales 440, 2nd floor, Col. Lomas de Chapultepec, 11000, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico.
  • Burns CC; Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
  • Gary HE; Global Immunization Division, Global Health Center, Centers for Control Disease and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
  • García-Lozano H; Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológico, Francisco de P. Miranda 177, Lomas de Plateros-Alvaro Obregon, Ciudad De México, 01480, Mexico.
  • Rey-Benito G; Immunization Unit, Pan American Health Organization, 525 23rd Street NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
  • Peñaranda S; Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
  • Castillo-Montufar KV; Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Ciudad de México, Montes Urales 440, 2nd floor, Col. Lomas de Chapultepec, 11000, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico.
  • Nava-Acosta RS; Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Ciudad de México, Montes Urales 440, 2nd floor, Col. Lomas de Chapultepec, 11000, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico.
  • Meschke JS; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, 4225 Roosevelt Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
  • Oberste MS; Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
  • Lopez-Martínez I; Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológico, Francisco de P. Miranda 177, Lomas de Plateros-Alvaro Obregon, Ciudad De México, 01480, Mexico.
  • Díaz-Quiñonez JA; Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológico, Francisco de P. Miranda 177, Lomas de Plateros-Alvaro Obregon, Ciudad De México, 01480, Mexico.
Food Environ Virol ; 11(4): 364-373, 2019 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31571037
To enhance our ability to monitor poliovirus circulation and certify eradication, we evaluated the performance of the bag-mediated filtration system (BMFS) against the two-phase separation (TPS) method for concentrating wastewater samples for poliovirus detection. Sequential samples were collected at two sites in Mexico; one L was collected by grab and ~ 5 L were collected and filtered in situ with the BMFS. In the laboratory, 500 mL collected by grab were concentrated using TPS and the sample contained in the filter of the BMFS was eluted without secondary concentration. Concentrates were tested for the presence of poliovirus and non-poliovirus enterovirus (NPEV) using Global Poliovirus Laboratory Network standard procedures. Between February 16, 2016, and April 18, 2017, 125 pairs of samples were obtained. Collectors spent an average (± standard deviation) of 4.3 ± 2.2 min collecting the TPS sample versus 73.5 ± 30.5 min collecting and filtering the BMFS sample. Laboratory processing required an estimated 5 h for concentration by TPS and 3.5 h for elution. Sabin 1 poliovirus was detected in 37 [30%] samples with the TPS versus 24 [19%] samples with the BMFS (McNemar's mid p value = 0.004). Sabin 3 poliovirus was detected in 59 [47%] versus 49 (39%) samples (p = 0.043), and NPEV was detected in 67 [54%] versus 40 [32%] samples (p < 0.001). The BMFS method without secondary concentration did not perform as well as the TPS method for detecting Sabin poliovirus and NPEV. Further studies are needed to guide the selection of cost-effective environmental surveillance methods for the polio endgame.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Ambiental / Poliovirus / Águas Residuárias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies País/Região como assunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Food Environ Virol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Ambiental / Poliovirus / Águas Residuárias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies País/Região como assunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Food Environ Virol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos