Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Planning forest restoration within private land holdings with conservation co-benefits at the landscape scale.
Niemeyer, Julia; Barros, Felipe S M; Silva, Daniel S; Crouzeilles, Renato; Vale, Mariana M.
Afiliação
  • Niemeyer J; Graduate Program in Ecology (PPGE), Biology Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Centro de Ciências da Saúde (CCS) - Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 21941-902, Brazil. Electronic address: julia.niemeyer@gmail.com.
  • Barros FSM; International Institute for Sustainability (IIS), Estrada Dona Castorina 124, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 22460-320, Brazil; Centro de Referencia en Tecnologías de la Información para la Gestión con Software Libre (CeRTIG+SoL), Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), 3300 Ruta 12 Km. 7 y 1/2 - Miguel Lanú
  • Silva DS; Department of Geography & the Environment, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78705, USA.
  • Crouzeilles R; International Institute for Sustainability (IIS), Estrada Dona Castorina 124, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 22460-320, Brazil; Rio Conservation and Sustainability Science Centre, Department of Geography and the Environment, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, Rio de Janeiro, -RJ, 22453-900, Brazil; Department
  • Vale MM; Department of Ecology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), C.P. 68020, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 21941-902, Brazil; International Global Change Laboratory (LINCGlobal), Instituto de Recursos Naturales, CCMA, CSIC, Serrano 115, E-28006 Madrid, Spain.
Sci Total Environ ; 717: 135262, 2020 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31839295
Forest loss is mainly due to the conversion of forest to agriculture, mostly in private lands. Forest restoration is a global priority, yet restoration targets are ambitious and budget-limited. Therefore, assessing the outcome of alternative decisions on land-use within private lands is paramount to perform cost-effective restoration. We present a novel framework that incorporates spatial planning for forest restoration within private lands with conservation co-benefits at the landscape scale. As a case study, we used three real landscapes of 10.000 ha with differing amounts of forest cover in the Atlantic Forest region of Brazil, and three hypothetical animal species with different dispersal abilities. We estimated the total amount of forest that landholders must restore to comply with the Native Vegetation Protection Law, which requires landholders to reforest 20% of their land within a 20-year time frame. We compared the cost-effectiveness of five restoration strategies based on the improvement in habitat availability and restoration costs. The most cost-effective strategy depends on a landscape's initial amount of forest cover and the species of concern. We revealed that spatial planning for restoration in private lands increased habitat availability up to 12 times more than random restoration, which was always the least cost-effective strategy. Cost-effective large-scale restoration in Brazil depends on public policies that assist landholders to comply with the law and on prioritizing areas for restoration within private lands. We show that by adding habitat availability as target in spatial prioritization, benefits for biodiversity can be hastened at low additional cost, even in real world scenarios with severe spatial constraints. Despite constraints, spatially planned restoration for law compliance in Brazil increased landscape permeability by creating corridors and stepping stones. Our framework should be used to plan restoration in Brazilian private lands and can be customized for other regions worldwide.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article