Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility and acceptability of introducing advance care planning on a thoracic medicine inpatient ward: an exploratory mixed method study.
Hjorth, Nina Elisabeth; Schaufel, Margrethe Aase; Sigurdardottir, Katrin Ruth; Haugen, Dagny R Faksvåg.
Afiliação
  • Hjorth NE; Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Services, Specialist Palliative Care Team, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway nina.elisabeth.hjorth@helse-bergen.no.
  • Schaufel MA; Department of Clinical Medicine K1, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Sigurdardottir KR; Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Haugen DRF; Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 7(1)2020 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32107203
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Advance care planning (ACP) is communication about wishes and preferences for end-of-life care. ACP is not routinely used in any Norwegian hospitals. We performed a pilot study (2014-2017) introducing ACP on a thoracic medicine ward in Norway. The aims of this study were to explore which topics patients discussed during ACP conversations and to assess how patients, relatives and clinicians experienced the acceptability and feasibility of performing ACP.

METHODS:

Conversations were led by a study nurse or physician using a semistructured guide, encouraging patients to talk freely. Each conversation was summarised in a report in the patient's medical record. At the end of the pilot period, clinicians discussed their experiences in focus group interviews. Reports and transcribed interviews were analysed using systematic text condensation.

RESULTS:

Fifty-one patients participated in ACP conversations (41-86 years; 9 COPD, 41 lung cancer, 1 lung fibrosis; 11 women); 18 were accompanied by a relative. Four themes emerged (1) disturbing symptoms, (2) existential topics, (3) care planning and (4) important relationships. All participants appreciated the conversations. Clinicians (1 physician and 7 nurses) participated in two focus group interviews. Reports from ACP conversations revealed patient values previously unknown to clinicians; important information was passed on to primary care. Fearing they would deprive patients of hope, clinicians acted as gatekeepers for recruitment. Although they reported barriers during recruitment, many clinicians saw ACP as pertinent and called for time and skills to integrate it into their daily clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients, relatives and clinicians showed a positive attitude towards ACP. Focusing on present and future symptom control may be an acceptable way to introduce ACP. Important aspects for implementing ACP in this patient group are management support, education, training, feasible routines and allocated time to perform the conversations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumologia / Atitude / Grupos Focais / Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pneumologia / Atitude / Grupos Focais / Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega