Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of NGS panel and Sanger sequencing for genotyping CAG repeats in the AR gene.
Rocca, Maria Santa; Ferrarini, Margherita; Msaki, Aichi; Vinanzi, Cinzia; Ghezzi, Marco; De Rocco Ponce, Maurizio; Foresta, Carlo; Ferlin, Alberto.
Afiliação
  • Rocca MS; Unit of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Ferrarini M; Unit of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Msaki A; Unit of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Vinanzi C; Unit of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Ghezzi M; Unit of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • De Rocco Ponce M; Unit of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Foresta C; Unit of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Ferlin A; Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Mol Genet Genomic Med ; 8(6): e1207, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32216057
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The androgen receptor (AR) is a nuclear receptor, encoded by the AR gene on the X chromosome. Within the first exon of the AR gene, two short tandem repeats (STR), CAG and GGC, are a source of polymorphism in the population. Therefore, high-throughput methods for screening AR, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), are sought after; however, data generated by NGS are limited by the availability of bioinformatics tools. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of the bioinformatics tool HipSTR in detecting and quantify CAG repeats within the AR gene.

METHOD:

The AR gene of 228 infertile men was sequenced using NGSgene panel. Data generated were analyzed with HipSTR to detect CAG repeats. The accuracy was compared with the results obtained with Sanger.

RESULTS:

We found that HipSTR was more accurate than Sanger in genotyping normal karyotype men (46,XY), however, it was more likely to misidentify homozygote genotypes in men with Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY).

CONCLUSION:

Our findings show that the bioinformatics tool HipSTR is 100% accurate in detecting and assessing AR CAG repeats in infertile men (46,XY) as well as in men with low-level mosaicism.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Receptores Androgênicos / Análise de Sequência de DNA / Repetições de Trinucleotídeos / Biologia Computacional / Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala / Técnicas de Genotipagem / Infertilidade Masculina Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Mol Genet Genomic Med Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Receptores Androgênicos / Análise de Sequência de DNA / Repetições de Trinucleotídeos / Biologia Computacional / Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala / Técnicas de Genotipagem / Infertilidade Masculina Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Mol Genet Genomic Med Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália