Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Learning Teams Versus Root Cause Analysis for Incident Investigation in a Large United Kingdom National Health Service Hospital.
Robbins, Tim; Tipper, Stephen; King, Justin; Ramachandran, Satya Krishna; Pandit, Jaideep J; Pandit, Meghana.
Afiliação
  • Tipper S; From the University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry.
  • King J; From the University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry.
  • Ramachandran SK; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Pandit JJ; Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
J Patient Saf ; 17(8): e1800-e1805, 2021 12 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32217930
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Significant resource is invested into investigation of adverse healthcare events. Outcomes of such investigations have varying degrees of effectiveness. The "hierarchy of effectiveness" model proposes system-focused changes have greater impact than person-focused actions. The traditional approach to investigation is root cause analysis (RCA); however, such an approach does not prioritize system-focused action generation. Learning team-based investigations are thought to generate more effective system-focused actions; however, this has not been evaluated.

METHODS:

Retrospective mixed methods evaluation of learning teams compared with RCA. Twenty-two learning team investigations compared with 22 RCA investigations, with quantitative assessment of the number of system-focused and person-focused actions generated. Assignment of the two different methods to incidents was not random, with learning teams being selected for cases, which were initially judged to be process-focused problems. Semistructured interviews were conducted with four learning team facilitators with thematic analysis to identify causes for outcome variations.

RESULTS:

Learning team investigations yielded a median of 7.5 actions compared with 3.5 actions for RCA 57% of learning team actions were system focused versus 30% for RCA. We identified variations in personnel involved, culture of the investigation, and differences in the investigative approaches as potential drivers for these differences.

CONCLUSIONS:

We observed that learning team investigations that targeted process-focused problems generated more actions and a higher number of system-focused actions. There is a difference in culture created during learning team investigations. Although learning teams are not suitable for all investigations, they represent a readily reproducible and valuable addition to the investigative toolkit.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Estatal / Análise de Causa Fundamental Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Saf Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Estatal / Análise de Causa Fundamental Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Saf Assunto da revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article