Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center.
Loehberg, Christian R; Meyer, Julia; Häberle, Lothar; Hack, Carolin C; Jud, Sebastian; Hein, Alexander; Wunderle, Marius; Emons, Julius; Gass, Paul; Fasching, Peter A; Egloffstein, Sainab; Krebs, Jessica; Erim, Yesim; Beckmann, Matthias W; Lux, Michael P; Wasner, Sonja.
Afiliação
  • Loehberg CR; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. christian.loehberg@uk-erlangen.de.
  • Meyer J; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Häberle L; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Hack CC; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Jud S; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Hein A; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Wunderle M; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Emons J; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Gass P; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Fasching PA; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Egloffstein S; Office of the CCC Erlangen-EMN (Comprehensive Cancer Center of the European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg-Erlangen), Erlangen, Germany.
  • Krebs J; Psychosomatic and Psychotherapeutic Department, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Erim Y; Psychosomatic and Psychotherapeutic Department, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Beckmann MW; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Lux MP; Office of the CCC Erlangen-EMN (Comprehensive Cancer Center of the European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg-Erlangen), Erlangen, Germany.
  • Wasner S; Department of Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University Breast Center and University Gynecological Cancer Center for Franconia, Universitaetsstr. 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 301(5): 1299-1306, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32274639
PURPOSE: Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients' motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with communications. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated second opinions for patients with breast cancer or gynecological malignancy. The patients received a questionnaire before and two months after, which inquired expectations, reasons, and satisfaction with the second opinion and the attending physicians. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included and the majority had breast cancer (75.0%). Receiving the second opinion made 89.7% feel better informed, their need for information decreased (from 75.3% to 39.2%, P < 0.0001), and satisfaction with doctor-patient communications increased (from 61.9 to 91.8%, P = 0.0002). There were various reasons for requesting a second opinion, e.g., the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis, hope for change in the treatment recommendation or dissatisfaction with the initial physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Second opinions can lead to significantly greater patient satisfaction, meeting the need for information and leading to better management of patients in the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis. Doctor-patient communications play a key role.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encaminhamento e Consulta / Neoplasias da Mama / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Encaminhamento e Consulta / Neoplasias da Mama / Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha