Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early experience with Watson for Oncology: a clinical decision-support system for prostate cancer treatment recommendations.
Yu, Seong Hyeon; Kim, Myung Soo; Chung, Ho Seok; Hwang, Eu Chang; Jung, Seung Il; Kang, Taek Won; Kwon, Dongdeuk.
Afiliação
  • Yu SH; Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim MS; Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
  • Chung HS; Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. hschung615@gmail.com.
  • Hwang EC; Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
  • Jung SI; Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang TW; Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
  • Kwon D; Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
World J Urol ; 39(2): 407-413, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32335733
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Urological oncologists have difficulty providing optimal personalized care due to rapid alterations in scientific research results, medical advancements, and treatment guidelines. IBM's Watson for Oncology (WFO) is an artificial intelligence clinical decision-support system that assists oncologists with evidence-based treatment recommendations. In the present study, we examined the level of concordance between the treatment recommendations for prostate cancer according to WFO and the actual treatments that the patients received in the department of urology.

METHODS:

We enrolled 201 patients who received prostate cancer treatment between January 2018 and June 2018. WFO provided treatment recommendations using clinical data in three categories recommended, for consideration, and not recommended. These were compared with the actual treatments received by patients. Prostate cancer treatments were considered concordant if the received treatments were included in the "recommended" or "for consideration" categories by WFO.

RESULTS:

The patients' mean age was 71.2 years. There were 60 (29.9%) and 114 (56.7%) patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≥ 1 and non-organ confined disease (stage III/IV), respectively. The overall prostate cancer treatment concordance rate was 73.6% ("recommended" 53.2%; "for consideration" 20.4%). An ECOG performance score ≥ 1 and older age (≥ 75 years) were significantly associated with discordance (p = 0.001 and p = 0.026, respectively) on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION:

In the present study, the treatment recommendations by WFO and the actual received treatments in the department of urology showed a relatively high concordance rate in prostate cancer patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Urologia / Inteligência Artificial / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Urologia / Inteligência Artificial / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas / Oncologia Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article