Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of abacavir/lamivudine plus rilpivirine as a first-line regimen in treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adults.
Ho, Sharlene; Wong, Joshua Guoxian; Ng, Oon Tek; Lee, Cheng Chuan; Leo, Yee Sin; Lye, David Chien Boon; Wong, Chen Seong.
Afiliação
  • Ho S; Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Wong JG; Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics and Knowledge, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Ng OT; National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Lee CC; Department of Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Leo YS; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Lye DCB; National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Wong CS; Department of Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
AIDS Res Ther ; 17(1): 23, 2020 05 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32438914
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The anti-retroviral combination of abacavir/lamivudine plus rilpivirine (ABC/3TC/RPV) is not recommended by international guidelines as the first-line regimen. However, it is potent, well-tolerated, and affordable, especially in resource-limited settings. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of ABC/3TC/RPV as an initial regimen for treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients.

METHODS:

A retrospective study was conducted in the largest HIV care centre in Singapore, with data collected June 2011 to September 2017. All treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected adults prescribed ABC/3TC as part of their initial anti-retroviral therapy regimen were included. The third drug was a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) such as RPV or efavirenz (EFV), or boosted protease-inhibitor (PI). Patients were followed up for 48 weeks. The primary end-point was the percentage of patients achieving virologic suppression, analysed using on-treatment analysis. Secondary outcomes included CD4-count change, treatment discontinuation and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS:

170 patients were included in the study, 66 patients in the RPV group, 104 patients in the comparator group (EFV or boosted PI). 96% (n = 24) in the RPV group and 87% (n = 26) in the comparator group achieved viral suppression at 48 weeks (p = 0.28). Median (interquartile range) time to viral suppression was similar 17 (14-24) weeks in the RPV group, and 21 (13-26) weeks in the comparator group. There were no statistically significant differences in the CD4 count between the two groups. 14% (n = 9) of patients on RPV discontinued treatment before 48 weeks, compared to 30% (n = 31) from the comparator group (p = 0.053). Of these, 23 discontinuations were due to drug adverse effects, and only 1 attributed to RPV (p < 0.01). One patient in each group had virologic failure.

CONCLUSION:

RPV is effective, safe and considerably more tolerable than compared to NNRTI or boosted PI in ABC/3TC-containing regimens for treatment-naïve patients. It offers an affordable and attractive option, especially in resource-limited settings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Didesoxinucleosídeos / Infecções por HIV / Lamivudina / Fármacos Anti-HIV / Rilpivirina Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: AIDS Res Ther Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Singapura

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Didesoxinucleosídeos / Infecções por HIV / Lamivudina / Fármacos Anti-HIV / Rilpivirina Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: AIDS Res Ther Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Singapura