Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard.
van der Straaten, Tirza F K; Briaire, Jeroen J; Vickers, Deborah; Boermans, Peter Paul B M; Frijns, Johan H M.
Afiliação
  • van der Straaten TFK; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Briaire JJ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Vickers D; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Boermans PPBM; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Frijns JHM; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ear Hear ; 42(1): 68-75, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32590629
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The impact of the newly introduced cochlear implantation criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium) was examined in the patient population of a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. We compared the patients who would be included/excluded under the new versus old criteria in relation to the actual improvement in speech understanding after implantation in our center. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to examine the effectiveness of the different preoperative assessment approaches used in the United Kingdom and Flanders.

DESIGN:

The selection criteria were based on preoperative pure-tone audiometry at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz and a speech perception test (SPT) with and without best-aided hearing aids. Postoperatively, the same SPT was conducted to assess the benefit in speech understanding.

RESULTS:

The newly introduced criteria in Flanders and the United Kingdom were less restrictive, resulting in greater percentages of patients implanted with CI (increase of 30%), and sensitivity increase of 31%. The preoperative best-aided SPT, used by both countries, had the highest diagnostic ability to indicate a postoperative improvement of speech understanding. We observed that patient selection was previously dominated by the pure-tone audiometry criteria in both countries, whereas speech understanding became more important in their new criteria. Among patients excluded by the new criteria, seven of eight (the United Kingdom and Flanders) did exhibit improved postoperative speech understanding.

CONCLUSIONS:

The new selection criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders led to increased numbers of postlingually deafened adults benefitting from CI. The new British and Flemish criteria depended on the best-aided SPT with the highest diagnostic ability. Notably, the new criteria still led to the rejection of candidates who would be expected to gain considerably in speech understanding after implantation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção da Fala / Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ear Hear Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Percepção da Fala / Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ear Hear Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda