Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
User-testing guidelines to improve the safety of intravenous medicines administration: a randomised in situ simulation study.
Jones, Matthew D; McGrogan, Anita; Raynor, D K; Watson, Margaret C; Franklin, Bryony Dean.
Afiliação
  • Jones MD; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK M.D.Jones@bath.ac.uk.
  • McGrogan A; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
  • Raynor DK; School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Watson MC; Luto Research, Leeds, UK.
  • Franklin BD; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 30(1): 17-26, 2021 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32606212
BACKGROUND: User-testing and subsequent modification of clinical guidelines increases health professionals' information retrieval and comprehension. No study has investigated whether this results in safer care. OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of medication errors when administering an intravenous medicine using the current National Health Service Injectable Medicines Guide (IMG) versus an IMG version revised with user-testing. METHOD: Single-blind, randomised parallel group in situ simulation. Participants were on-duty nurses/midwives who regularly prepared intravenous medicines. Using a training manikin in their clinical area, participants administered a voriconazole infusion, a high-risk medicine requiring several steps to prepare. They were randomised to use current IMG guidelines or IMG guidelines revised with user-testing. Direct observation was used to time the simulation and identify errors. Participant confidence was measured using a validated instrument. The primary outcome was the percentage of simulations with at least one moderate-severe IMG-related error, with error severity classified by an expert panel. RESULTS: In total, 133 participants were randomised to current guidelines and 140 to user-tested guidelines. Fewer moderate-severe IMG-related errors occurred with the user-tested guidelines (n=68, 49%) compared with current guidelines (n=79, 59%), but this difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio: 0.82; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.02). Significantly more simulations were completed without any IMG-related errors with the user-tested guidelines (n=67, 48%) compared with current guidelines (n=26, 20%) (risk ratio: 2.46; 95% CI 1.68 to 3.60). Median simulation completion time was 1.6 min (95% CI 0.2 to 3.0) less with the user-tested guidelines. Participants who used user-tested guidelines reported greater confidence. CONCLUSION: User-testing injectable medicines guidelines reduces the number of errors and the time taken to prepare and administer intravenous medicines, while increasing staff confidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: researchregistry5275.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Estatal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Estatal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article