Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The bone attachments of the medial collateral and posterior oblique ligaments are defined anatomically and radiographically.
Athwal, K K; Willinger, L; Shinohara, S; Ball, S; Williams, A; Amis, Andrew A.
Afiliação
  • Athwal KK; The Biomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
  • Willinger L; The Biomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
  • Shinohara S; Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Ball S; The Biomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
  • Williams A; Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8628, Japan.
  • Amis AA; Fortius Clinic, 17 Fitzhardinge St, London, W1H 6EQ, UK.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 28(12): 3709-3719, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32737529
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To define the bony attachments of the medial ligaments relative to anatomical and radiographic bony landmarks, providing information for medial collateral ligament (MCL) surgery.

METHOD:

The femoral and tibial attachments of the superficial MCL (sMCL), deep MCL (dMCL) and posterior oblique ligament (POL), plus the medial epicondyle (ME) were defined by radiopaque staples in 22 knees. These were measured radiographically and optically; the precision was calculated and data normalised to the sizes of the condyles. Femoral locations were referenced to the ME and to Blumensaat's line and the posterior cortex.

RESULTS:

The femoral sMCL attachment enveloped the ME, centred 1 mm proximal to it, at 37 ± 2 mm (normalised at 53 ± 2%) posterior to the most-anterior condyle border. The femoral dMCL attachment was 6 mm (8%) distal and 5 mm (7%) posterior to the ME. The femoral POL attachment was 4 mm (5%) proximal and 11 mm (15%) posterior to the ME. The tibial sMCL attachment spread from 42 to 71 mm (81-137% of A-P plateau width) below the tibial plateau. The dMCL fanned out anterodistally to a wide tibial attachment 8 mm below the plateau and between 17 and 39 mm (33-76%) A-P. The POL attached 5 mm below the plateau, posterior to the dMCL. The 95% CI intra-observer was ± 0.6 mm, inter-observer ± 1.3 mm for digitisation. The inter-observer ICC for radiographs was 0.922.

CONCLUSION:

The bone attachments of the medial knee ligaments are located in relation to knee dimensions and osseous landmarks. These data facilitate repairs and reconstructions that can restore physiological laxity and stability patterns across the arc of knee flexion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tíbia / Ligamento Colateral Médio do Joelho / Fêmur / Ligamentos Articulares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tíbia / Ligamento Colateral Médio do Joelho / Fêmur / Ligamentos Articulares Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Assunto da revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido