Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Upfront or intermediate treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients with cytoreduction plus HIPEC: Results of a retrospective study.
Spiliotis, John; Iavazzo, Christos; Fotiou, Alexandros; Kopanakis, Nikolaos; Terra, Alexios; Efstathiou, Elias; Margari, Charalambia; Tsiatas, Marinos.
Afiliação
  • Spiliotis J; Department of Surgical Oncology and HIPEC, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Greece.
  • Iavazzo C; Department of Surgical Oncology and HIPEC, European Interbalkan Medical Centre, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Fotiou A; Department of Gynecological Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
  • Kopanakis N; Department of Gynecological Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
  • Terra A; First Department of Surgical Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
  • Efstathiou E; First Department of Surgical Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
  • Margari C; First Department of Surgical Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
  • Tsiatas M; Department of Medical Oncology, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Greece.
J Surg Oncol ; 123(2): 630-637, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33125733
BACKGROUND: Newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, primary or intermediate cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the optimal timing of cytoreduction plus HIPEC for advanced ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC at three different hospitals between 2005 and 2019 were subgrouped regarding their time of management with cytoreduction plus HIPEC, upfront or intermediate. We retrospectively assessed the overall survival (OS), the progression-free survival (PFS), and the disease-free survival (DFS) of these groups. RESULTS: A total of 112 ovarian cancer patients were contained. Of whom, 47 patients were in the upfront group with 24 (51.1%) to be alive, while 65 patients were included in the intermediate group with 34 (52.3%) to be alive. OS (48 vs. 30 months) and DFS (42 vs. 20 months) indicated no significant difference. Although the same median PFS was observed in both groups (10 months), a higher mean PFS was observed in the upfront group (11.9 vs. 9 months, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: The treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients with upfront cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC is feasible with the same survival results. Further, larger prospective studies need to verify our results.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução / Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica / Hipertermia Induzida Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução / Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica / Hipertermia Induzida Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia