Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Decision criteria and patient characteristics for patient-oriented treatment of field cancerization : Standardized algorithm for personalized treatment concepts]. / Entscheidungskriterien und Patientencharakteristika zur patientenorientierten Therapie der Feldkanzerisierung : Ein standardisierter Bewertungsalgorithmus für individuelle Behandlungskonzepte.
Philipp-Dormston, W G; Aschoff, R; von Braunmühl, T; Eigentler, T; Haalck, T; Thoms, K-M.
Afiliação
  • Philipp-Dormston WG; Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland. mail@haut-zentrum.com.
  • Aschoff R; Hautzentrum Köln, Klinik Links vom Rhein, Schillingsrotter Str. 39-41, 50996, Köln, Deutschland. mail@haut-zentrum.com.
  • von Braunmühl T; Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
  • Eigentler T; Praxis für Dermatologie und Allergologie im Isarklinikum München, München, Deutschland.
  • Haalck T; Zentrum für Dermatologische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
  • Thoms KM; Fachbereich Dermatologie, Ambulanzzentrum des UKE GmbH - Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum (MVZ) des Universitätsklinikums Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Deutschland.
Hautarzt ; 72(4): 314-320, 2021 Apr.
Article em De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33263779
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Actinic keratosis (AK), which frequently affects larger skin areas (field cancerization), is characterized by chronic course. Weighing therapy-specific advantages and disadvantages of field-oriented therapy for individual patients is challenging.

OBJECTIVES:

The main objective was the development of patient-oriented decision criteria for the pragmatic classification of field-directed AK treatment options in patients with a predisposition for field cancerization (patient types 1-3). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The development of the decision criteria and patient typology was based on a nominal respectively structured multilevel group process. The developed algorithm was then subsequently applied for the systematic evaluation of field-directed AK therapies.

RESULTS:

Patient-relevant criteria for the treatment decision included (among others) effectiveness, selectivity, safety, duration of therapy, cosmesis, patient preference and comorbidities. With regard to the decision criteria and patient types in which field therapy was the treatment of choice, daylight photodynamic therapy notably met the requirement profile.

CONCLUSION:

The definition of patient-relevant and therapy-related decision criteria in AK field therapy allows a systematic yet practice-oriented approach to classify specific treatment options and to derive individual treatment decisions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fotoquimioterapia / Neoplasias Cutâneas / Ceratose Actínica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: De Revista: Hautarzt Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fotoquimioterapia / Neoplasias Cutâneas / Ceratose Actínica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: De Revista: Hautarzt Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article