Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure.
Cernis, Emma; Bird, Jessica C; Molodynski, Andrew; Ehlers, Anke; Freeman, Daniel.
Afiliação
  • Cernis E; Oxford Cognitive Approaches to Psychosis, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Bird JC; Oxford Cognitive Approaches to Psychosis, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Molodynski A; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Ehlers A; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Freeman D; Oxford Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Behav Cogn Psychother ; : 1-13, 2020 Dec 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33446299
BACKGROUND: Catastrophic cognitive appraisals, similar to those in anxiety disorders, are implicated in depersonalisation, a form of dissociation. No scales exist to measure appraisals of dissociative experiences. Dissociation is common in psychosis. Misinterpretations of dissociative experiences may maintain psychotic symptoms. Therefore, assessing appraisals in this context may be valuable. AIMS: The primary aim was to develop a measure of key appraisals of dissociation in psychosis. Secondary aims were to test the relationship between appraisals and psychotic experiences (paranoia and hallucinations), and determine whether appraisals explain additional variance in psychotic symptoms above dissociative symptoms. METHOD: Fifty items were generated from transcripts of interviews with patients. The measure was developed and psychometrically validated via factor analysis of data from 9902 general population participants and 1026 patients with psychosis. Convergent validity, test-re-test reliability, and internal reliability were assessed. Regression analyses tested relationships with psychotic symptoms. RESULTS: A 13-item single-factor measure was developed. Factor analysis indicated good model fit [χ2(65) = 247.173, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.960, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.052]. The scale had good convergent validity with a rumination (non-clinical: r = 0.71; clinical: r = 0.73) and dissociation measure (r = 0.81; r = 0.80), high internal consistency (α = 0.93; α = 0.93), and excellent 1-week test-re-test reliability [intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.90]. It explained variance in psychotic symptoms (paranoia: 36.4%; hallucinations: 35.0%), including additional variance compared with dissociation alone (paranoia: 5.3%; hallucinations: 2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The Cognitive Appraisals of Dissociation in Psychosis (CAD-P) measure is a psychometrically robust scale identifying appraisals of dissociative experiences in psychosis and is associated with the presence of psychotic experiences. It is likely to prove useful for clinical assessment and research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Behav Cogn Psychother Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO / PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Behav Cogn Psychother Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO / PSIQUIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article