Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.
Oh, Richul; Oh, Joo Youn; Choi, Hyuk Jin; Kim, Mee Kum; Yoon, Chang Ho.
Afiliação
  • Oh R; Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
  • Oh JY; Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
  • Choi HJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Kim MK; Laboratory of Ocular Regenerative Medicine and Immunology (LORMI), Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Yoon CH; Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 21(1): 62, 2021 Jan 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33504333
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Precise measurement of ocular biometry is critical for determining intraocular lens power. Newly developed swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) - based ocular biometric devices, ANTERION and CASIA2 provide ocular biometric measurements as IOLMaster 700. This study aimed to assess agreement between three devices.

METHODS:

This retrospective comparative study includes patients with cataract who underwent ocular biometric measurements with three devices, ANTERION, CASIA2, and IOLMaster 700, at Seoul National University Hospital, in April 2020. Anterior keratometry, total keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were the main parameters for the comparison. To assess the agreement between the devices, intraclass coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used.

RESULTS:

A total of 47 eyes of 29 patients were measured with three devices. Average anterior keratometry showed excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.989), and the mean difference was less than 0.1 D. However, the ICC of the total average keratometry ranged from 0.808 to 0.952, and the difference was more than 0.43 D. The AL measured by ANTERION and IOLMaster 700 showed excellent agreement (ICC = 0.999), and the mean difference was 0.005 mm. The ANTERION and IOLMaster 700 did not obtain AL in six (12.8%) and three (6.4%) cases, respectively (P = 0.001 by Fisher's exact test). The CCT, ACD, and LT also showed excellent agreement (ICC > 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS:

The new SS-OCT-based devices, ANTERION, and CASIA2 showed a good agreement with IOLMaster 700 in measuring ocular biometry except for the total keratometry. The AL of ANTERION and IOLMaster 700 showed excellent agreement.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Catarata / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Ophthalmol Assunto da revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Catarata / Tomografia de Coerência Óptica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Ophthalmol Assunto da revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul