Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physician perspectives on complementary and alternative medicine in hidradenitis suppurativa.
Price, Kyla N; Collier, Erin K; Grogan, Tristan; Fernandez, Jennifer M; Alhusayen, Raed; Alavi, Afsaneh; Hamzavi, Iltefat H; Lowes, Michelle A; Porter, Martina J; Hsiao, Jennifer L; Shi, Vivian Y.
Afiliação
  • Price KN; College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Collier EK; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, California, Los Angeles, USA.
  • Grogan T; Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, California, Los Angeles, USA.
  • Fernandez JM; College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
  • Alhusayen R; Division of Dermatology and Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Alavi A; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Hamzavi IH; Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Lowes MA; The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Porter MJ; Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hsiao JL; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, California, Los Angeles, USA.
  • Shi VY; Department of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(2): e14851, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33547869
ABSTRACT
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic and often debilitating inflammatory condition characterized by frequent nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts, and scars impacting the intertriginous areas. Many patients with HS often report limited treatment success and symptom coverage with conventional therapies. Recent studies have reported the widespread use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among patients with HS. In this study, our aim was to examine current physician practice patterns, opinions, and comfort with recommending CAM. Our results indicate that provider comfort and opinions on CAM varied based on the provider's experiences, demographics, and the CAM modality itself. Overall, nearly two-thirds (n = 30, 61.2%) of respondents agreed that CAM and conventional medicine were more effective together than either alone. Meanwhile, 44.9% (n = 22) of respondents routinely recommend CAM while 64.6% (n = 31) of respondents reported that they are routinely asked about CAM. The majority (n = 41, 83.7%) of respondents indicated a lack of scientific evidence in the medical literature as a barrier to recommending CAM along with efficacy concerns (n = 34, 69.4%) and ability to recommend reputable CAM products (n = 32, 65.3%) and practitioners (n = 32, 65.3%). Future investigations are warranted to establish a better understanding of the efficacy and benefit of CAM methods in conjunction with conventional methods.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Terapias Complementares / Hidradenite Supurativa Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Ther Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Terapias Complementares / Hidradenite Supurativa Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dermatol Ther Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos