Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Computer-Assisted Secondary Orbital Reconstruction.
Singh, Daman D; Schorn, Lara; Strong, E Bradley; Grant, Michael; Schramm, Alexander; Hufendiek, Karsten; Gellrich, Nils-Claudius; Rana, Majeed.
Afiliação
  • Singh DD; Department of Oral-, Maxillo- and Plastic Facial Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
  • Schorn L; Department of Oral-, Maxillo- and Plastic Facial Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
  • Strong EB; Department of Otolaryngology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  • Grant M; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Schramm A; Department of Oral-, Maxillo- and Plastic Facial Surgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Hufendiek K; Department of Oral-, Maxillo- and Plastic Facial Surgery, University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Gellrich NC; Department of Oral-, Maxillo- and Plastic Facial Surgery, University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
  • Rana M; Department of Oral-, Maxillo- and Plastic Facial Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr ; 14(1): 29-35, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33613833
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

This study presents a case-control study of 33 patients who underwent secondary orbital reconstruction, evaluating techniques and outcome.

OBJECTIVE:

Adequate functional and aesthetical appearance are main goals for secondary orbital reconstruction. Insufficient premorbid orbital reconstruction can result in hypoglobus, enophthalmos, and diplopia. Computer-assisted surgery and the use of patient-specific implants (PSIs) is widely described in the literature. The authors evaluate the use of selective laser-melted PSIs and hypothesize that PSIs are an excellent option for secondary orbital reconstruction.

METHODS:

The sample was composed of 33 patients, previously treated with primary orbital reconstruction, presenting themselves with indications for secondary reconstruction (i.e. enophthalmos, diplopia, or limited eye motility). Computed tomography and/or cone beam data sets were assessed before and after secondary reconstruction comparing intraorbital volumes, infraorbital angles, and clinical symptoms. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a standardized protocol.

RESULTS:

Results show a significant change in intraorbital volumes and a reduction of clinical symptoms after secondary reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Outcomes of this study suggest that secondary orbital reconstruction can be performed routinely using selective laser-melted PSIs and titanium spacers.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha