Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does Employing a Flowchart Improve the Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Left Ventricular Noncompaction?
Alis, Deniz; Bagcilar, Omer; Asmakutlu, Ozan; Topel, Cagdas; Bagcilar, Yeseren Deniz; Sahin, Anil; Gurbak, Ismail; Karaarslan, Ercan.
Afiliação
  • Alis D; Department of Radiology, Istanbul Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University.
  • Bagcilar O; Department of Radiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih.
  • Asmakutlu O; Department of Radiology.
  • Topel C; Department of Radiology.
  • Bagcilar YD; Department of Radiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih.
  • Sahin A; Department of Cardiology, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Halkali, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Gurbak I; Department of Cardiology, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Halkali, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Karaarslan E; Department of Radiology, Istanbul Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University.
Acta Cardiol Sin ; 37(2): 166-176, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33716458
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To test the hypothesis that making a diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) using a noncompacted-to-compacted (NC/C) myocardium ratio > 2.3 would yield significant errors, and also to test a diagnostic flowchart in patients who undergo CMRI and have clinical and echocardiographic findings suggesting LVNC could improve the diagnosis of LVNC.

METHODS:

A total of 84 patients with LVNC and 162 controls consisting of patients with other diseases and healthy participants who had CMRI and echocardiograms were selected. The diagnostic flowchart of the study involved the use of CMRI with all available sequences for patients with a high pre-test probability of LVNC. Two blinded independent cardiologists evaluated echocardiograms, and patients with suggestive echocardiographic and clinical findings for LVNC were enrolled in the high pre-test probability of LVNC group. Two independent blinded radiologists established the diagnosis of LVNC based on NC/C ratio > 2.3 on CMRI, and they were allowed to re-assess the patients following the diagnostic flowchart.

RESULTS:

An NC/C ratio > 2.3 identified 83 of 84 LVNC patients, yet incorrectly classified 48 of the 162 controls as having LVNC. Radiologists changed their decision in 23 of 48 patients with incorrect diagnoses, resulted in improved specificity (70.4% to 84.6%). The use of the CMRI diagnostic flowchart in the high pre-test probability group yielded a high specificity (97.2%) and accuracy (95.9%).

CONCLUSIONS:

LVNC diagnosed by CMRI based on the NC/C criterion can lead to overdiagnosis, whereas only using CMRI in patients with a high pre-test probability of LVNC with all available sequences may improve the diagnostic performance.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Acta Cardiol Sin Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Acta Cardiol Sin Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article