Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical significance of incidentally detected lead perforations by computed tomography.
Bhatia, Prerana; Chiou, Tommy; Svennberg, Emma; Khoche, Swapnil; Jacobs, Kathleen; Pollema, Travis; Pretorius, Victor; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika.
Afiliação
  • Bhatia P; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Chiou T; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Svennberg E; Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet-Karolinksa University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Khoche S; Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Jacobs K; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Pollema T; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Pretorius V; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • Birgersdotter-Green U; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 44(5): 936-942, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33786829
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) has an established role in detecting perforation of implanted pacemaker and defibrillator leads. The clinical significance of incidental finding of delayed lead perforation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of lead perforation as detected by CT in a cohort of patients undergoing transvenous laser lead extraction and characterize the association between finding of incidental lead perforation with periprocedural outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients that underwent chest CT and lead extraction were retrospectively assessed for presence of lead perforation. A total of 143 patients and 348 leads were assessed. The finding of lead perforation was correlated with findings from peri-procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and outcomes of the lead extraction procedure. RESULTS: Lead perforations (including perforations <5 mm and ≥5 mm) were detected in 66 (46%) patients and 73 (21%) leads. Lead perforation ≥5 mm were less common and detected in 13 (9%) of patients and 14 (4%) of leads. There was no significant difference in the rates of peri-procedural death, cardiac avulsion, cardiac tamponade or post-extraction pericardial effusion in patients with and without lead perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental delayed lead perforations detected by CT are common and do not correlate with significant TEE findings or adverse peri-procedural outcomes in patients undergoing lead extraction. Larger studies are needed to further characterize the frequency and safety of these findings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Remoção de Dispositivo / Eletrodos Implantados Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Remoção de Dispositivo / Eletrodos Implantados Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos