Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.
Omer, Mohamed A; Brilakis, Emmanouil S; Kennedy, Kevin F; Alkhouli, Mohamad; Elgendy, Islam Y; Chan, Paul S; Spertus, John A.
Afiliação
  • Omer MA; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. Electronic address: omer.mohamed1@mayo.edu.
  • Brilakis ES; Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Kennedy KF; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
  • Alkhouli M; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Elgendy IY; Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
  • Chan PS; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
  • Spertus JA; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 14(10): 1067-1078, 2021 05 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933384
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to compare in-hospital outcomes and long-term mortality of multivessel versus culprit vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), multivessel disease (MVD) and cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND:

The clinical benefits of complete revascularization in patients with NSTEMI, MVD, and cardiogenic shock remain uncertain.

METHODS:

Among 25,324 patients included in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry from July 2009 to March 2018, the rates of in-hospital procedural outcomes were compared between those undergoing multivessel PCI and those undergoing culprit vessel-only PCI after 11 propensity score matching. Among patients aged ≥65 years matched to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database, long-term mortality was compared using proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS:

Multivessel PCI was performed in 9,791 patients (38.7%), which increased from 32.2% in 2010 to 44.2% in 2017 (p for trend <0.001). After 11 propensity matching (n = 7,864 in each group), those undergoing multivessel PCI had a 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0% to 5.0%) lower absolute rate of in-hospital mortality (30.9% vs. 34.4%; p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR] 0.85; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.91), but a higher risk for bleeding (13.2% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.001; OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.40) and new requirement for dialysis (5.7% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.001; OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.46). Among those surviving to discharge, all-cause mortality was similar through 7 years (conditional hazard ratio 0.95; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.03; p = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS:

Nearly 40% of patients with NSTEMI with MVD and cardiogenic shock underwent multivessel PCI, which was associated with lower in-hospital mortality but greater peri-procedural complications. Among those surviving to discharge, multivessel PCI did not confer additional long-term mortality benefit.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea / Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST / Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Intervenção Coronária Percutânea / Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST / Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article