Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychological interventions for reducing anxiety in patients undergoing first-time colonoscopy: a pilot and feasibility study.
Albashir, Siwar; Durepos, Pamela; Causada Calo, Natalia; Mangat, Ramandeep; Nowakowski, Matilda; Kaasalainen, Sharon; Anglin, Rebecca; Moayyedi, Paul; Armstrong, David.
Afiliação
  • Albashir S; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
  • Durepos P; McMaster University, Faculty of Nursing, Hamilton, Ontario.
  • Causada Calo N; University of New Brunswick, School of Nursing, Fredericton, New Brunswick.
  • Mangat R; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.
  • Nowakowski M; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
  • Kaasalainen S; Department of Psychiatry, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Anglin R; McMaster University, Faculty of Nursing, Hamilton, Ontario.
  • Moayyedi P; Department of Psychiatry, University of Notre Dame, Perth, Western, Australia.
  • Armstrong D; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 33(1S Suppl 1): e634-e641, 2021 12 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034274
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), evaluating the efficacy and patients' perceptions of a psychological intervention aimed at reducing anxiety levels in adults undergoing first-time colonoscopy.

METHODS:

Adults undergoing first-time colonoscopy were randomized to a psychological intervention vs. sham intervention. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as a recruitment rate of >50%. Patients' state anxiety was assessed before and after the intervention using the state-trait inventory for cognitive and somatic anxiety (STICSA) score. Follow-up interviews were performed within 1 week with a sample of patients and focus groups with clinical staff.

RESULTS:

A total of 130 patients were recruited from 180 eligible patients (72%). Eighty were randomized and completed the study (n = 39) in the psychological intervention group and (n = 41) in the sham. In the psychological intervention group, pre- and postmedian STICSA scores were 29 and 24 (P < 0.001), respectively. In the sham group, pre- and postmedian scores were 31 and 25 (P < 0.001), respectively. Follow-up interviews with patients (n = 13) suggested that 100% of patients perceived the psychological intervention as beneficial and would recommend it to others.

CONCLUSION:

The study was feasible. Patients in both groups improved their anxiety scores, but there were no significant differences between arms. Despite this, patients receiving psychological intervention perceived a benefit from the relaxation exercises.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ansiedade / Intervenção Psicossocial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ansiedade / Intervenção Psicossocial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article