Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comprehensive assessment of the effect of eye plaque tilt on tumor dosimetry.
Studenski, Matthew T; Markoe, Arnold; Samuels, Stuart E; Correa, Zelia M; Bossart, Elizabeth; Harbour, J William.
Afiliação
  • Studenski MT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL. Electronic address: m.studenski@med.miami.edu.
  • Markoe A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
  • Samuels SE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
  • Correa ZM; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
  • Bossart E; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
  • Harbour JW; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Brachytherapy ; 20(6): 1289-1295, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34193361
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Tilting of the posterior plaque margin during eye plaque brachytherapy can lead to tumor underdosing and increased risk of local recurrence. We performed a quantitative analysis of the dosimetric effects of plaque tilt as a function of tumor position, basal dimension, height and plaque type using 3D treatment planning software. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Posterior and anterior tumors with largest basal dimensions of 6, 12 and 18 mm and heights of 4, 7 and 10 mm were modeled. Both Eye Physics and COMS plaques were simulated and uniformly loaded. Plans were normalized to 85 Gy at the tumor apex. Posterior plaque tilts of 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm were simulated.

RESULTS:

Volumetric coverage is more sensitive to tilt than the area coverage. Wide, flat tumors are more susceptible to tilt. Apical dose changed significantly as a function of tumor height and diameter. No other parameter exhibited significant differences. Posterior tumors are slightly more susceptible to tilt due to the use of notched plaques. Plaque type does not significantly alter the effect of plaque tilt.

CONCLUSIONS:

Wide, flat tumors are the most susceptible to plaque tilt. Tumor location or plaque type does not have a significant effect on dosimetry changes from plaque tilt. Robust clinical procedures such as the use of mattress sutures, pre- and post-implant ultrasound and post-implant dosimetry can all mitigate the risk associated with plaque tilt.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias Oculares / Melanoma Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Braquiterapia / Neoplasias Oculares / Melanoma Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article