Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Communication failures contributing to patient injury in anaesthesia malpractice claims☆.
Douglas, Rachel N; Stephens, Linda S; Posner, Karen L; Davies, Joanna M; Mincer, Shawn L; Burden, Amanda R; Domino, Karen B.
Afiliação
  • Douglas RN; Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Stephens LS; Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Posner KL; Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Davies JM; Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Mincer SL; Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Burden AR; Department of Anesthesiology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
  • Domino KB; Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: kdomino@uw.edu.
Br J Anaesth ; 127(3): 470-478, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34238547
BACKGROUND: Communication amongst team members is critical to providing safe, effective medical care. We investigated the role of communication failures in patient injury using the Anesthesia Closed Claims Project database. METHODS: Claims associated with surgical/procedural and obstetric anaesthesia and postoperative pain management for adverse events from 2004 or later were included. Communication was defined as transfer of information between two or more parties. Failure was defined as communication that was incomplete, inaccurate, absent, or not timely. We classified root causes of failures as content, audience, purpose, or occasion with inter-rater reliability assessed by kappa. Claims with communication failures contributing to injury (injury-related communication failures; n=389) were compared with claims without any communication failures (n=521) using Fisher's exact test, t-test, or Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: At least one communication failure contributing to patient injury occurred in 43% (n=389) out of 910 claims (κ=0.885). Patients in claims with injury-related communication failures were similar to patients in claims without failures, except that failures were more common in outpatient settings (34% vs 26%; P=0.004). Fifty-two claims had multiple communication failures for a total of 446 injury-related failures, and 47% of failures occurred during surgery, 28% preoperatively, and 23% postoperatively. Content failures (insufficient, inaccurate, or no information transmitted) accounted for 60% of the 446 communication failures. CONCLUSIONS: Communication failure contributed to patient injury in 43% of anaesthesia malpractice claims. Patient/case characteristics in claims with communication failures were similar to those without failures, except that failures were more common in outpatient settings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Relações Médico-Paciente / Relações Profissional-Família / Erros Médicos / Comunicação Interdisciplinar / Analgesia / Anestesia / Imperícia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente / Relações Médico-Paciente / Relações Profissional-Família / Erros Médicos / Comunicação Interdisciplinar / Analgesia / Anestesia / Imperícia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos