Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: An In Vitro Comparison (Torsional Resistance of Two Heat-treated Reciprocating Files).
Bhandi, Shilpa; Seracchiani, Marco; Donfrancesco, Orlando; Reda, Rodolfo; Mazzoni, Alessandro; Nottola, Stefania; Familiari, Giuseppe; Testarelli, Luca; Gambarini, Gianluca.
Afiliação
  • Bhandi S; Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
  • Seracchiani M; Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Donfrancesco O; Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Reda R; Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, Phone: +39 3287353196, e-mail: rodolforeda17@gmail.com.
  • Mazzoni A; Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Nottola S; Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Familiari G; Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopaedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Testarelli L; Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Gambarini G; Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 22(4): 361-364, 2021 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34267004
AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to evaluate the difference in torsional resistance of two reciprocating nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary files: WaveOne Gold and EdgeOne Fire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 nickel-titanium rotary instruments (n = 40): 20 WaveOne Gold Small (WOGS) and 20 EdgeOne Fire Small (EOFS) were divided into two groups. Each instrument was tested using a torsional resistance device already validated in previous studies to evaluate and compare torsional resistance. The static torsional test was implemented by blocking each instrument at 3 mm from the tip and rotating it until fracture with a reciprocating motion. Torque to fracture (TtF) and fragment length (FL) were measured and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of TtF found significant differences between the two groups (p<0.05). The EOFS showed higher TtF if compared to WOGS, with a mean value and a standard deviation of 3.05 ± 0.07 (N cm) against 2.97 ± 0.08 (N cm). Data for FL showed no significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, it is reasonable to assert that EOFS instruments showed a higher torsional resistance if compared to the WOGS. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: As evidenced by this study, EOFS should be considered as a safer solution, in terms of torsional resistance, if compared to WOGS, reducing the risk of intracanal separation due to excessive torsional load.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Titânio / Níquel Idioma: En Revista: J Contemp Dent Pract Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Arábia Saudita
Buscar no Google
Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Titânio / Níquel Idioma: En Revista: J Contemp Dent Pract Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Arábia Saudita