The value of a comprehensive primary outcome - results of a negative randomized control trial in the non-muscle invasive bladder cancer population.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines recommend intravesical chemotherapy to be given following transurethral resection of a bladder tumor. Prior studies have shown the benefit of mitomycin as well as gemcitabine. However, no study has compared the two agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as an open label 111 randomized controlled trial, comparing intravesical mitomycin, gemcitabine and saline as a single intraoperative instillation immediately following transurethral resection of suspected bladder tumor. Primary endpoint was any grade ≥ 3 events according to NCI CTCAE Version 4.03, this captures any return trip to the operating room for recurrence of cancer or other event (benign bladder/urethra). Secondary endpoints were progression free survival for urothelial cell carcinoma and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were enrolled and randomized, unfortunately the trial was suspended early due to protocol deviations. In an intention to treat analysis, freedom from grade > 3 events at 2 years was 74.8% in the no treatment arm, 51.0% in the mitomycin arm, and 56.0% in the gemcitabine arm (p = 0.81). Freedom from cancer recurrence for all patients was 62.3%. In the no treatment arm, it was 78.8%, and 50.7% and 63.6% in the mitomycin arm and gemcitabine arm respectively. (p = 0.28). In a univariate analysis, the only patient variable significantly associated with the primary outcome was pathologic T stage (p < 0.002). CONCLUSION: This study provides an example of a novel, patient centered primary outcome with the goal of determining which treatment paradigms provide the greatest oncologic and clinic benefit.