Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pregnancy potential and perinatal outcomes of embryos cryopreserved twice: a case-control study.
Hallamaa, Marianne; Seikkula, Jaana; Willman, Sami; Ollila, Helena; Jokimaa, Varpu.
Afiliação
  • Hallamaa M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku 20520, Finland. Electronic address: marianne.hallamaa@tyks.fi.
  • Seikkula J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä 40620, Finland.
  • Willman S; Ovumia Fertinova Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä 40100, Finland.
  • Ollila H; Turku Clinical Research Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku 20521, Finland.
  • Jokimaa V; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku 20520, Finland.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 43(4): 607-613, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34412972
ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION What are the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of twice-cryopreserved embryos compared with embryos cryopreserved once?

DESIGN:

Retrospective register-based case-control study. The case group consisted of transfers of twice-cryopreserved embryos (n = 89), and the control group of transfers of embryos cryopreserved once (n = 304). Matching criteria were embryonic age at transfer and female age category of less than 35 years or 35 and greater.

RESULTS:

The survival rate of twice-cryopreserved embryos was 92.2%, and 93.7% of the planned frozen embryo transfers (FET) could be completed. FET was performed with cleavage-stage embryos in 17 cases and 68 controls and with blastocysts in 72 cases and 238 controls. The rates of live birth (27.0% versus 31.9%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.40-1.22, P = 0.21), clinical pregnancy (31.5% versus 36.8%, adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.42-1.21, P = 0.21) and miscarriage (4.5% versus 3.9%, adjusted OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.33-3.60, P = 0.88) in the case and the control groups were comparable. No difference was seen in the preterm delivery rate (cases 4.2% versus controls 10.3%, P = 0.69). Twenty-five children were born in the case group and 100 in the control group. No difference in birthweight was detected between the groups and there were no large for gestational age fetuses or congenital malformations in the case group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Uncompromised live birth rates and neonatal outcomes may be expected after the transfer of twice-cryopreserved embryos. To avoid embryo wastage and transfer of multiple embryos, good quality surplus embryos from FET cycles may be cryopreserved again by vitrification.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Blastocisto / Criopreservação / Coeficiente de Natalidade / Transferência Embrionária Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Biomed Online Assunto da revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Blastocisto / Criopreservação / Coeficiente de Natalidade / Transferência Embrionária Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Biomed Online Assunto da revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article