Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antitumor activity of ipilimumab or BRAF ± MEK inhibition after pembrolizumab treatment in patients with advanced melanoma: analysis from KEYNOTE-006.
Long, G V; Arance, A; Mortier, L; Lorigan, P; Blank, C; Mohr, P; Schachter, J; Grob, J-J; Lotem, M; Middleton, M R; Neyns, B; Steven, N; Ribas, A; Walpole, E; Carlino, M S; Lebbe, C; Sznol, M; Jensen, E; Leiby, M A; Ibrahim, N; Robert, C.
Afiliação
  • Long GV; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address:
  • Arance A; Hospital Clinic de Barcelona and IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Mortier L; Université Lille, Inserm U1189, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.
  • Lorigan P; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Blank C; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Mohr P; Elbe-Klinikum Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany.
  • Schachter J; Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Grob JJ; Aix Marseille University, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.
  • Lotem M; Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Hebrew Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Middleton MR; The Churchill Hospital and The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Neyns B; Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Steven N; Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
  • Ribas A; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Walpole E; Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Carlino MS; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Lebbe C; Université de Paris, APHP Hôpital Saint-Louis, Dermatology Department, DMU ICARE, INSERM U-976, France.
  • Sznol M; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Jensen E; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
  • Leiby MA; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
  • Ibrahim N; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
  • Robert C; Department of Oncology, Service of Dermatology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Paris-Saclay University, Orsay, France.
Ann Oncol ; 33(2): 204-215, 2022 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710571
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Antitumor activity of ipilimumab or BRAF ± MEK inhibitors (BRAFi ± MEKi) following pembrolizumab administration in melanoma is poorly characterized. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

In the phase III KEYNOTE-006 study, patients with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma received pembrolizumab (10 mg/kg) once every 2 or 3 weeks (Q3W) or ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) Q3W. The current post hoc analysis evaluates outcomes with ipilimumab or BRAFi ± MEKi as first subsequent systemic therapy after pembrolizumab administration and includes patients who completed or discontinued pembrolizumab after one or more dose. Pembrolizumab arms were pooled.

RESULTS:

At data cut-off (4 December 2017), median follow-up was 46.9 months. Of 555 pembrolizumab-treated patients, first subsequent therapy was ipilimumab for 103 (18.6%) and BRAFi ± MEKi for 59 (10.6%) [33 received BRAFi + MEKi, 26 BRAFi alone; 37 (62.7%) were BRAFi ± MEKi naïve]. In the subsequent ipilimumab group, ORR with previous pembrolizumab was 17.5% [1 complete response (CR); 17 partial response (PR)]; 79.6% had discontinued pembrolizumab due to progressive disease (PD); median overall survival (OS) was 21.5 months. ORR with subsequent ipilimumab was 15.5%; 11/16 responses (8 CRs; 3 PRs) were ongoing. ORR with subsequent ipilimumab was 9.7% for patients with PD as best response to pembrolizumab. Median OS from ipilimumab initiation was 9.8 months. In the subsequent BRAFi ± MEKi group, ORR with previous pembrolizumab was 13.5% (8 PR); 76.3% had discontinued pembrolizumab due to PD; median OS was 17.9 months. ORR with subsequent BRAFi ± MEKi was 30.5%, 7/18 responses (4 CR, 3 PR) were ongoing. Median OS from BRAFi ± MEKi initiation was 12.9 months. ORR for BRAFi ± MEKi-naïve patients who received subsequent BRAFi ± MEKi was 43.2%; 6/16 were ongoing (3 CR, 3 PR).

CONCLUSIONS:

Ipilimumab and BRAFi ± MEKi have antitumor activity as first subsequent therapy after pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf / Melanoma Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf / Melanoma Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article