Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube With Stylet on Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Among Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Driver, Brian E; Semler, Matthew W; Self, Wesley H; Ginde, Adit A; Trent, Stacy A; Gandotra, Sheetal; Smith, Lane M; Page, David B; Vonderhaar, Derek J; West, Jason R; Joffe, Aaron M; Mitchell, Steven H; Doerschug, Kevin C; Hughes, Christopher G; High, Kevin; Landsperger, Janna S; Jackson, Karen E; Howell, Michelle P; Robison, Sarah W; Gaillard, John P; Whitson, Micah R; Barnes, Christopher M; Latimer, Andrew J; Koppurapu, Vikas S; Alvis, Bret D; Russell, Derek W; Gibbs, Kevin W; Wang, Li; Lindsell, Christopher J; Janz, David R; Rice, Todd W; Prekker, Matthew E; Casey, Jonathan D.
Afiliação
  • Driver BE; Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Semler MW; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Self WH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Ginde AA; Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Trent SA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
  • Gandotra S; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
  • Smith LM; Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.
  • Page DB; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Vonderhaar DJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • West JR; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Joffe AM; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Mitchell SH; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, Louisiana.
  • Doerschug KC; Section of Emergency Medicine, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans.
  • Hughes CG; Department of Emergency Medicine, Lincoln Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
  • High K; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Landsperger JS; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Jackson KE; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
  • Howell MP; Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Robison SW; Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Gaillard JP; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Whitson MR; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Barnes CM; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
  • Latimer AJ; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Koppurapu VS; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • Alvis BD; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Russell DW; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Gibbs KW; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Wang L; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Lindsell CJ; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
  • Janz DR; Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Rice TW; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Prekker ME; Pulmonary Section, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Casey JD; Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Immunologic Disease, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
JAMA ; 326(24): 2488-2497, 2021 12 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34879143
Importance: For critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation, failure to intubate the trachea on the first attempt occurs in up to 20% of cases and is associated with severe hypoxemia and cardiac arrest. Whether using a tracheal tube introducer ("bougie") increases the likelihood of successful intubation compared with using an endotracheal tube with stylet remains uncertain. Objective: To determine the effect of use of a bougie vs an endotracheal tube with stylet on successful intubation on the first attempt. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Bougie or Stylet in Patients Undergoing Intubation Emergently (BOUGIE) trial was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial among 1102 critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation in 7 emergency departments and 8 intensive care units in the US between April 29, 2019, and February 14, 2021; the date of final follow-up was March 14, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to use of a bougie (n = 556) or use of an endotracheal tube with stylet (n = 546). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcome was the incidence of severe hypoxemia, defined as a peripheral oxygen saturation less than 80%. Results: Among 1106 patients randomized, 1102 (99.6%) completed the trial and were included in the primary analysis (median age, 58 years; 41.0% women). Successful intubation on the first attempt occurred in 447 patients (80.4%) in the bougie group and 453 patients (83.0%) in the stylet group (absolute risk difference, -2.6 percentage points [95% CI, -7.3 to 2.2]; P = .27). A total of 58 patients (11.0%) in the bougie group experienced severe hypoxemia, compared with 46 patients (8.8%) in the stylet group (absolute risk difference, 2.2 percentage points [95% CI, -1.6 to 6.0]). Esophageal intubation occurred in 4 patients (0.7%) in the bougie group and 5 patients (0.9%) in the stylet group, pneumothorax was present after intubation in 14 patients (2.5%) in the bougie group and 15 patients (2.7%) in the stylet group, and injury to oral, glottic, or thoracic structures occurred in 0 patients in the bougie group and 3 patients (0.5%) in the stylet group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, use of a bougie did not significantly increase the incidence of successful intubation on the first attempt compared with use of an endotracheal tube with stylet. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03928925
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Intubação Intratraqueal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Intubação Intratraqueal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article