Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Defining the Validity of Skin Self-Examination as a Screening Test for the Detection of Suspicious Pigmented Lesions: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.
Jiyad, Zainab; Plasmeijer, Elsemieke I; Keegan, Samantha; Samarasinghe, Venura; Green, Adele C; Akhras, Victoria.
Afiliação
  • Jiyad Z; Department of Dermatology, St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Plasmeijer EI; Population Health Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Keegan S; The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Samarasinghe V; Department of Dermatology, St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Green AC; Department of Dermatology, St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Akhras V; Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Dermatology ; 238(4): 640-648, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34979506
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Skin self-examination (SSE) is widely promoted for the detection of suspicious pigmented lesions. However, determining screening accuracy is essential to appraising the usefulness of SSE.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this work was to pool estimates from studies of SSE diagnostic accuracy in the detection of suspicious pigmented lesions.

METHODS:

This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021246356) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA-DTA guidelines. A systematic search of Medline (PubMed) EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library was conducted to identify relevant studies. We included studies that examined the accuracy of SSE, either whole-body or site-specific, for detecting change in individual pigmented lesions or detecting an atypical naevus. A univariate random-effects model, based on logit-transformed data, was used to calculate a summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) as well as pooled sensitivity and specificity. Cochran's Q test and the I2 statistic were calculated to assess heterogeneity. A proportional hazards model was used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and plot the summary receiver operator characteristic curve. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool to grade study quality.

RESULTS:

We identified 757 studies, of which 3 met inclusion criteria for quantitative synthesis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity based on 553 included participants was 59 and 82%, respectively. The summary DOR was 5.88 and the AUC was 0.71. There were some concerns regarding risk of bias in all 3 studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

SSE can detect suspicious pigmented lesions with reasonable sensitivity and relatively high specificity, with the AUC suggesting acceptable discriminatory ability.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dermatology Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Cutâneas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dermatology Assunto da revista: DERMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido