Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sensitivity of RT-PCR testing of upper respiratory tract samples for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Williams, Thomas C; Wastnedge, Elizabeth; McAllister, Gina; Bhatia, Ramya; Cuschieri, Kate; Kefala, Kallirroi; Hamilton, Fiona; Johannessen, Ingólfur; Laurenson, Ian F; Shepherd, Jill; Stewart, Alistair; Waters, Donald; Wise, Helen; Templeton, Kate E.
Afiliação
  • Williams TC; IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Wastnedge E; Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • McAllister G; Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Bhatia R; Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Cuschieri K; Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Kefala K; Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Hamilton F; Critical Care Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Johannessen I; Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Laurenson IF; Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Shepherd J; Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Stewart A; Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Waters D; eHealth Directorate, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Wise H; Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Templeton KE; Department of Blood Sciences, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Wellcome Open Res ; 5: 254, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35169637
ABSTRACT

Background:

This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) testing of upper respiratory tract (URT) samples from hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), compared to the gold standard of a clinical diagnosis.

Methods:

All URT RT-PCR testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in NHS Lothian, Scotland, United Kingdom between the 7 th of February and 19 th April 2020 (inclusive) was reviewed, and hospitalised patients were identified. All URT RT-PCR tests were analysed for each patient to determine the sequence of negative and positive results. For those who were tested twice or more but never received a positive result, case records were reviewed, and a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 allocated based on clinical features, discharge diagnosis, and radiology and haematology results. For those who had a negative RT-PCR test but a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, respiratory samples were retested using a multiplex respiratory panel, a second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, and a human RNase P control.

Results:

Compared to the gold standard of a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, the sensitivity of a single upper respiratory tract RT-PCR for COVID-19 was 82.2% (95% confidence interval 79.0-85.1%).   The sensitivity of two upper respiratory tract RT-PCR tests increased sensitivity to 90.6% (CI 88.0-92.7%). A further 2.2% and 0.9% of patients who received a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 were positive on a third and fourth test; this may be an underestimate of the value of further testing as the majority of patients 93.0% (2999/3226) only had one or two URT RT-PCR tests.

Conclusions:

The sensitivity of a single RT-PCR test of URT samples in hospitalised patients is 82.2%. Sensitivity increases to 90.6% when patients are tested twice.  A proportion of cases with clinically defined COVID-19 never test positive on URT RT-PCR despite repeat testing.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Wellcome Open Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Wellcome Open Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido