Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Separation efficiency of different solid-liquid separation technologies for slurry and gas emissions of liquid and solid fractions: A meta-analysis.
Zhang, Xinxing; Liu, Chunjing; Liao, Wenhua; Wang, Shanshan; Zhang, Weitao; Xie, Jianzhi; Gao, Zhiling.
Afiliação
  • Zhang X; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University. Baoding, PR China.
  • Liu C; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University. Baoding, PR China; Key Laboratory for Farmland Eco-Environment of Hebei Province, Baoding, PR China.
  • Liao W; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University. Baoding, PR China; Key Laboratory for Farmland Eco-Environment of Hebei Province, Baoding, PR China.
  • Wang S; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University. Baoding, PR China.
  • Zhang W; General Husbandry Station of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, 050000, PR China.
  • Xie J; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University. Baoding, PR China; Key Laboratory for Farmland Eco-Environment of Hebei Province, Baoding, PR China.
  • Gao Z; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University. Baoding, PR China; Key Laboratory for Farmland Eco-Environment of Hebei Province, Baoding, PR China. Electronic address: zhilinggao@hebau.edu.cn.
J Environ Manage ; 310: 114777, 2022 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35219208
Solid-liquid separation (SLS) technology is widely used in the slurry management in animal farms. This study conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of 45 published articles to evaluate the differences in separation efficiencies (SEX-SF) of various SLSs and the changes of gas emissions before and after the separation during on-farm slurry storage. The results indicated that the SEX-SF of the untreated raw slurry and acidified slurry were consistently greater than those of the digested slurry, and centrifugation resulted in greater SEX-SF than the other mechanical methods. Both measured and simulated data showed that the centrifuge technology had greater reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relative to the screw press (56.1-58.0% vs. 38.9-40.2% for untreated slurry, and 29.7-30.2% vs. 22.5-23.2% for digested slurry), mainly due to CH4 reduction. Additionally, we identify the need for further assessment of the environmental risks that are associated with SLSs for the development of an optimal slurry management chain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gases de Efeito Estufa / Esterco Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gases de Efeito Estufa / Esterco Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article