Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.
Holmqvist, Kenneth; Örbom, Saga Lee; Hooge, Ignace T C; Niehorster, Diederick C; Alexander, Robert G; Andersson, Richard; Benjamins, Jeroen S; Blignaut, Pieter; Brouwer, Anne-Marie; Chuang, Lewis L; Dalrymple, Kirsten A; Drieghe, Denis; Dunn, Matt J; Ettinger, Ulrich; Fiedler, Susann; Foulsham, Tom; van der Geest, Jos N; Hansen, Dan Witzner; Hutton, Samuel B; Kasneci, Enkelejda; Kingstone, Alan; Knox, Paul C; Kok, Ellen M; Lee, Helena; Lee, Joy Yeonjoo; Leppänen, Jukka M; Macknik, Stephen; Majaranta, Päivi; Martinez-Conde, Susana; Nuthmann, Antje; Nyström, Marcus; Orquin, Jacob L; Otero-Millan, Jorge; Park, Soon Young; Popelka, Stanislav; Proudlock, Frank; Renkewitz, Frank; Roorda, Austin; Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Michael; Sharif, Bonita; Shic, Frederick; Shovman, Mark; Thomas, Mervyn G; Venrooij, Ward; Zemblys, Raimondas; Hessels, Roy S.
Afiliação
  • Holmqvist K; Department of Psychology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de.
  • Örbom SL; Department of Computer Science and Informatics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de.
  • Hooge ITC; Department of Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany. kenneth.holmqvist@ur.de.
  • Niehorster DC; Department of Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Alexander RG; Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Andersson R; Lund University Humanities Lab and Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Benjamins JS; Department of Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
  • Blignaut P; Tobii Pro AB, Danderyd, Sweden.
  • Brouwer AM; Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Chuang LL; Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Dalrymple KA; Department of Computer Science and Informatics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
  • Drieghe D; TNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
  • Dunn MJ; Department of Ergonomics, Leibniz Institute for Working Environments and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
  • Ettinger U; Institute of Informatics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Fiedler S; Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
  • Foulsham T; School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • van der Geest JN; School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
  • Hansen DW; Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Hutton SB; Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kasneci E; Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Essex, UK.
  • Kingstone A; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Knox PC; Machine Learning Group, Department of Computer Science, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Kok EM; SR Research Ltd, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Lee H; Human-Computer Interaction, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Lee JY; University of British Columbia, Columbia, Canada.
  • Leppänen JM; Department of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Macknik S; Department of Education and Pedagogy, Division Education, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Majaranta P; Department of Online Learning and Instruction, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
  • Martinez-Conde S; University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Nuthmann A; School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Nyström M; Department of Psychology and Speed-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Orquin JL; Department of Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
  • Otero-Millan J; TAUCHI Research Center, Computing Sciences, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • Park SY; Department of Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
  • Popelka S; Institute of Psychology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Proudlock F; Lund University Humanities Lab, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Renkewitz F; Department of Management, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Roorda A; Center for Research in Marketing and Consumer Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Schulte-Mecklenbeck M; Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Sharif B; Comparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Shic F; Department of Geoinformatics, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Shovman M; The University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Thomas MG; Department of Psychology, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
  • Venrooij W; Herbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  • Zemblys R; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Hessels RS; Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Behav Res Methods ; 55(1): 364-416, 2023 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35384605
In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking studies. We find that reporting guidelines vary substantially and do not match with actual reporting practices. We end by deriving a minimal, flexible reporting guideline based on empirical research (Section "An empirically based minimal reporting guideline").
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Movimentos Oculares / Tecnologia de Rastreamento Ocular Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Behav Res Methods Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Polônia
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Movimentos Oculares / Tecnologia de Rastreamento Ocular Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Behav Res Methods Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Polônia