Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Staff perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of quality of life, health, wellbeing, recovery and reduced risk for older forensic mental-health patients: A qualitative interview study.
Walker, Kate; Yates, Jen; Dening, Tom; Völlm, Birgit; Tomlin, Jack; Griffiths, Chris.
Afiliação
  • Walker K; Research Associate, Innovation and Research Department, Berrywood Hospital, 8954Northampton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • Yates J; Assistant Professor, Mental Health, Institute of Mental Health, 6123University of Nottingham, UK.
  • Dening T; Professor, Dementia Research, Institute of Mental Health, 235792University of Nottingham, UK.
  • Völlm B; Director, Klinik und Poliklinik für Forensische Psychiatrie, University Hospital of Rostock, Germany.
  • Tomlin J; Research Fellow, School of Law and Criminology, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom.
  • Griffiths C; Senior Research and Evaluation Fellow, Innovation and Research Department, Berrywood Hospital, Northampton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
J Health Serv Res Policy ; 27(4): 287-300, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35584368
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

There is a lack of research informing service delivery for older forensic mental health patients. This study explored service provision in forensic mental health inpatient and community services in England, investigating what is required for progress in terms of quality of life, health, wellbeing, recovery and reduced risk, and the barriers and facilitators associated with this.

METHODS:

Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 48 members of staff working with older forensic mental health patients in secure inpatient units or the community in England. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

Two global themes 'What works' and 'What doesn't work' were identified comprising themes representing environmental, interpersonal and individual factors. 'What works' included positive social support and relationships; individualised holistic patient-centred care; hub and spoke approach to patient care; and suitable environments. 'What doesn't work' included absence of/or maladaptive relationships with family and friends; gaps in service provision; and unsuitable environments.

CONCLUSIONS:

For older patients to progress to improved quality of life, health, wellbeing and reduced risk, multilevel and comprehensive support is required, comprising a range of services, interventions, and multidisciplinary input, and individualised to each patient's needs. The physical environment needs to be adapted for older patients and provide a social environment that seeks to include supportive families, friends and expert professional input. A clear patient progression pathway is required; this must be reflected in policy and provision.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Saúde Mental Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Health Serv Res Policy Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Saúde Mental Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Health Serv Res Policy Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido