Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
3D printing for orbital volume anatomical measurement.
Piot, Nolwenn; Barry, Florent; Schlund, Matthias; Ferri, Joël; Demondion, Xavier; Nicot, Romain.
Afiliação
  • Piot N; Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et Stomatologie, Hôpital Roger Salengro - CHU Lille, Rue Emile Laine, 59037, Lille Cedex, France. nolwenn.piot@hotmail.fr.
  • Barry F; INSERM, Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et Stomatologie, U1008 - Controlled Drug Delivery Systems and Biomaterials, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
  • Schlund M; INSERM, Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et Stomatologie, U1026 - Bioengineering of Tissues, Univ. of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
  • Ferri J; INSERM, Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et Stomatologie, U1008 - Controlled Drug Delivery Systems and Biomaterials, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
  • Demondion X; ULR 7367 - UTML&A - Unité de Taphonomie Médico-Légale, d'Anatomie, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
  • Nicot R; INSERM, Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et Stomatologie, U1008 - Controlled Drug Delivery Systems and Biomaterials, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, F-59000, Lille, France.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 44(7): 991-998, 2022 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35779076
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The aim was to develop a method for reproducible orbital volume (OV) measurement in vivo based on 3D printing.

METHODS:

Twelve orbits were obtained from dry skulls of the Human Anatomy Department of Lille University. Computer tomography (CT) slice images of these orbits were transformed into stereo-lithography (STL) format and 3D-printed. Bone openings were closed using either putty and cellophane after printing (3D-Orb-1) or at the printing stage in silico using MeshMixer (3D-Orb-2). The results were compared with those of the conventional water-filling method as a control group (Anat-Orb).

RESULTS:

The observers reported a mean orbital volume of 21.3 ± 2.1 cm3 for the open-skull method, 21.2 ± 2.4 cm3 for the non-sealed 3D-printing method, and 22.2 ± 2.0 cm3 for the closed-print method. Furthermore, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) showed excellent intra-rater agreement, i.e., an ICC of 0.994 for the first observer and 0.998 for the second, and excellent interobserver agreement (ICC 0.969). The control and 3D-Orb-1 groups show excellent agreement (ICC 0.972). The 3D-Orb-2 exhibits moderate agreement (ICC 0.855) with the control and appears to overestimate orbital volume slightly.

CONCLUSION:

Our 3D-printing method provides a standardized and reproducible method for the measurement of orbital volume.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Órbita / Impressão Tridimensional Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Radiol Anat Assunto da revista: ANATOMIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Órbita / Impressão Tridimensional Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Radiol Anat Assunto da revista: ANATOMIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França