Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based risk priority number for risk assessments of commissioning process of a ring gantry LINAC.
Chang, Jina; Jang, Siyoung; Lalonde, Ron; Huq, Saiful M.
Afiliação
  • Chang J; Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Jang S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Lalonde R; Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Huq SM; Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 23(11): e13760, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35998202
PURPOSE: We propose a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based risk priority number (RPN) method in failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to overcome the shortcomings of traditional RPN-based FMEA. Our research group has previously published the FMEA to mitigate the failure modes (FMs) for the commissioning process of a ring gantry LINAC. However, inter-relationships among FMs were observed in high ranked FMs due to a heavy reliance on imaging system. METHODS: Fuzzy AHP was applied to determine relative weights of risk impacts based on inter-relationships among FMs. Since the time sequence dependency is a major factor for risk factors, a hierarchical structure of AHP was used to reflect the directional impacts such as causal influence and feedback loop. Two fuzzy weighted RPNs, called (RPNW and FRPNW , were calculated depending on the input values of severity (S), occurrence (O), and probability of not being detected (D) from the evaluators. The RPNW used numerical values, whereas the fuzzy values were used for FRPNW . Both RPNs were calculated by multiplying the weighted O, S, and D using the fuzzy AHP method. RESULTS: The differences between the two fuzzy RPN rankings are due to inherent fuzzy uncertainty and deviations in O, S, and D values submitted by the evaluators. Considering all results of traditional and fuzzy-based FMEA, the two most highly ranked FMs were identified: errors in determining the non-isocentric SSD and SSD from MV images because of the unique features of the ring gantry LINAC. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated the feasibility of the use of a fuzzy AHP-based RPN to perform comprehensive analysis and prioritization of FMs. The risk analysis using fuzzy AHP can be improved and/or refined based on the department's specific workflow and clinical preferences taking various priority weighting approaches into account.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aceleradores de Partículas / Processo de Hierarquia Analítica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aceleradores de Partículas / Processo de Hierarquia Analítica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos