Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of donor quality and risk of graft failure after liver transplantation: The ID2 EAL score.
Asrani, Sumeet K; Saracino, Giovanna; Wall, Anji; Trotter, James F; Testa, Giuliano; Hernaez, Ruben; Sharma, Pratima; Kwong, Allison; Banerjee, Srikanta; McKenna, Gregory.
Afiliação
  • Asrani SK; Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Heath, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Saracino G; Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Heath, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Wall A; Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Heath, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Trotter JF; Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Heath, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Testa G; Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Heath, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Hernaez R; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Sharma P; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Kwong A; Stanford University, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Banerjee S; School of Health Sciences, Walden University, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • McKenna G; Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White Heath, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Am J Transplant ; 22(12): 2921-2930, 2022 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36053559
Accurate assessment of donor quality at the time of organ offer for liver transplantation candidates may be inadequately captured by the donor risk index (DRI). We sought to develop and validate a novel objective and simple model to assess donor risk using donor level variables available at the time of organ offer. We utilized national data from candidates undergoing primary LT (2013-2019) and assessed the prediction of graft failure 1 year after LT. The final components were donor Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, Donor type (DCD or DBD), cause of Death = CVA, serum creatinine, Age, height, and weight (length). The ID2 EAL score had better discrimination than DRI using bootstrap corrected concordant index over time, especially in the current era. We explored donor-recipient matching. Relative risk of graft failure ranged from 1.15 to 3.5 based on relevant donor-recipient matching by the ID2 EAL score. As an example, for certain recipients, a young DCD donor offer was preferable to an older DBD with relevant comorbidities. The ID2 EAL score may serve as an important tool for patient discussion about donor risk and decisions regarding offer acceptance. In addition, the score may be preferable to succinctly capture donor risk in future organ allocation that considers continuous distribution (www.iddealscore.com).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Fígado / Doença Hepática Terminal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Fígado / Doença Hepática Terminal Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos