Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CO2 Is Beneficial to Gut Microbiota Homeostasis during Colonoscopy: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Yang, Xue; Xiu, Wen-Bo; Wang, Jin-Xia; Li, Liang-Ping; He, Chong; Gao, Cai-Ping.
Afiliação
  • Yang X; Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan Academy of Science & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610072, China.
  • Xiu WB; Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan Academy of Science & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610072, China.
  • Wang JX; Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610072, China.
  • Li LP; Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan Academy of Science & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610072, China.
  • He C; Clinical Immunology Translational Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610072, China.
  • Gao CP; Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan Academy of Science & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610072, China.
J Clin Med ; 11(18)2022 Sep 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36142931
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many studies have reported minor complications and disturbance of the gut microbiota after colonoscopy. Compared with air, carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation could decrease minor complications, but its impact on gut microbiota remains unknown.

METHODS:

Thirty-eight healthy subjects were assessed and twenty were randomized to receive either CO2 or air insufflation during colonoscopy. Neither the participants nor the staff involved in the follow-up knew which gas was used. Minor complications were assessed using symptom scores. Fecal samples were collected at eight time-points for microbiome analysis by full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis.

RESULTS:

Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The recovery of minor complications after colonoscopy was faster in the CO2 group (the day of the colonoscopy) than in the air group (the day after the colonoscopy). There was no significant reduction in alpha diversity (species richness) of the first stool after colonoscopy in the CO2 group (115.0 ± 32.81 vs. 97.4 ± 42.31, p = 0.28) compared with the air group (123.8 ± 37.25 vs. 84.8 ± 31.67, p = 0.04). However, there were no differences in beta diversity between the groups. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis indicated that anaerobic probiotics such as Bacteroides caccae, Bacteroides finegoldii and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron were more abundant in the CO2 group than in the air group within 14 days after colonoscopy. On the contrary, the content of Escherichiacoli, Ruminococcus torques and Ruminococcus guavus was higher in the air group.

CONCLUSIONS:

CO2 is beneficial to gut microbiota homeostasis during colonoscopy in healthy subjects. The effects in patients with different diseases need to be further studied.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China