Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility.
Héroux, Martin E; Butler, Annie A; Cashin, Aidan G; McCaughey, Euan J; Affleck, Andrew J; Green, Michael A; Cartwright, Andrew; Jones, Matthew; Kiely, Kim M; van Schooten, Kimberley S; Menant, Jasmine C; Wewege, Michael; Gandevia, Simon C.
Afiliação
  • Héroux ME; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Butler AA; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Cashin AG; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • McCaughey EJ; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Affleck AJ; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Green MA; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Cartwright A; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Jones M; Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Campus, Glasgow, UK.
  • Kiely KM; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • van Schooten KS; Department of Neuropathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Menant JC; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Wewege M; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Gandevia SC; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 12(9): e060976, 2022 09 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167369
Research must be well designed, properly conducted and clearly and transparently reported. Our independent medical research institute wanted a simple, generic tool to assess the quality of the research conducted by its researchers, with the goal of identifying areas that could be improved through targeted educational activities. Unfortunately, none was available, thus we devised our own. Here, we report development of the Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA), and its application to publications from our institute's scientists. Following consensus meetings and external review by statistical and methodological experts, 11 items were selected for the final version of the QuOCCA: research transparency (items 1-3), research design and analysis (items 4-6) and research reporting practices (items 7-11). Five pairs of raters assessed all 231 articles published in 2017 and 221 in 2018 by researchers at our institute. Overall, the results were similar between years and revealed limited engagement with several recommended practices highlighted in the QuOCCA. These results will be useful to guide educational initiatives and their effectiveness. The QuOCCA is brief and focuses on broadly applicable and relevant concepts to open, high-quality, reproducible and well-reported science. Thus, the QuOCCA could be used by other biomedical institutions and individual researchers to evaluate research publications, assess changes in research practice over time and guide the discussion about high-quality, open science. Given its generic nature, the QuOCCA may also be useful in other research disciplines.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lista de Checagem / Relatório de Pesquisa Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lista de Checagem / Relatório de Pesquisa Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália