Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clustering of trauma patients based on longitudinal data and the application of machine learning to predict recovery.
Stoitsas, Kostas; Bahulikar, Saurabh; de Munter, Leonie; de Jongh, Mariska A C; Jansen, Maria A C; Jung, Merel M; van Wingerden, Marijn; Van Deun, Katrijn.
Afiliação
  • Stoitsas K; Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, 5000 LE, The Netherlands. kstoitsas@gmail.com.
  • Bahulikar S; Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg, 5000 LE, The Netherlands.
  • de Munter L; Department Traumatology, ETZ Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • de Jongh MAC; Network Emergency Care Brabant, Brabant Trauma Registry, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Jansen MAC; Network Emergency Care Brabant, Brabant Trauma Registry, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Jung MM; Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg, 5000 LE, The Netherlands.
  • van Wingerden M; Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, Tilburg University, Tilburg, 5000 LE, The Netherlands.
  • Van Deun K; Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, 5000 LE, The Netherlands.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 16990, 2022 10 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36216874
Predicting recovery after trauma is important to provide patients a perspective on their estimated future health, to engage in shared decision making and target interventions to relevant patient groups. In the present study, several unsupervised techniques are employed to cluster patients based on longitudinal recovery profiles. Subsequently, these data-driven clusters were assessed on clinical validity by experts and used as targets in supervised machine learning models. We present a formalised analysis of the obtained clusters that incorporates evaluation of (i) statistical and machine learning metrics, (ii) clusters clinical validity with descriptive statistics and medical expertise. Clusters quality assessment revealed that clusters obtained through a Bayesian method (High Dimensional Supervised Classification and Clustering) and a Deep Gaussian Mixture model, in combination with oversampling and a Random Forest for supervised learning of the cluster assignments provided among the most clinically sensible partitioning of patients. Other methods that obtained higher classification accuracy suffered from cluster solutions with large majority classes or clinically less sensible classes. Models that used just physical or a mix of physical and psychological outcomes proved to be among the most sensible, suggesting that clustering on psychological outcomes alone yields recovery profiles that do not conform to known risk factors.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado de Máquina / Aprendizado de Máquina Supervisionado Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aprendizado de Máquina / Aprendizado de Máquina Supervisionado Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda