Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study.
Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip; Wark, Petra A; Mastellos, Nikolaos; Neves, Ana Luisa; Gallagher, Joseph; Majeed, Azeem; Webster, Andrew; Smith, Anthony; Choo-Kang, Brian; Leon, Catherine; Edwards, Christopher; O'Shea, Conor; Heitz, Elizabeth; Kayode, Olamide Valentine; Nash, Makeba; Kowalski, Martin; Jiwani, Mateen; O'Callaghan, Michael Edmund; Zary, Nabil; Henderson, Nicola; Chavannes, Niels H; Civljak, Rok; Olubiyi, Olubunmi Abiola; Mahapatra, Piyush; Panday, Rishi Nannan; Oriji, Sunday O; Fox, Tatiana Erlikh; Faint, Victoria; Car, Josip.
Afiliação
  • Fadahunsi KP; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Wark PA; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Mastellos N; Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
  • Neves AL; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Gallagher J; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Majeed A; gHealth Research Group, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Webster A; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Smith A; Leeds Teaching Hospital National Health Service Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • Choo-Kang B; Health Board, Hywel Dda University, Wales, United Kingdom.
  • Leon C; Glasgow Royal Infirmary, National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
  • Edwards C; Oxford University National Health Service Foundation Trusts, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • O'Shea C; Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • Heitz E; Wheaton Hall Medical Practice, Drogheda, Co Louth, Ireland.
  • Kayode OV; Croydon Health Services, Croydon, United Kingdom.
  • Nash M; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Evercare Hospital Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria.
  • Kowalski M; Croydon Health Services, Croydon, United Kingdom.
  • Jiwani M; Department of Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • O'Callaghan ME; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Zary N; School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Henderson N; Institute for Excellence in Health Professions Education, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
  • Chavannes NH; National Health Service Forth Valley, Scotland, United Kingdom.
  • Civljak R; National eHealth Living Lab, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
  • Olubiyi OA; University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Mahapatra P; University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
  • Panday RN; Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia.
  • Oriji SO; West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Watford, United Kingdom.
  • Fox TE; Acute Medicine Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center Location, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Faint V; Department of Mental Health, Nnewi Campus, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.
  • Car J; Centre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
J Med Internet Res ; 24(12): e41889, 2022 12 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36472901
BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs), such as electronic health records and prescribing systems, are transforming health care delivery around the world. The quality of information in DHTs is key to the quality and safety of care. We developed a novel clinical information quality (CLIQ) framework to assess the quality of clinical information in DHTs. OBJECTIVE: This study explored clinicians' perspectives on the relevance, definition, and assessment of information quality dimensions in the CLIQ framework. METHODS: We used a systematic and iterative eDelphi approach to engage clinicians who had information governance roles or personal interest in information governance; the clinicians were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Data were collected using semistructured online questionnaires until consensus was reached on the information quality dimensions in the CLIQ framework. Responses on the relevance of the dimensions were summarized to inform decisions on retention of the dimensions according to prespecified rules. Thematic analysis of the free-text responses was used to revise definitions and the assessment of dimensions. RESULTS: Thirty-five clinicians from 10 countries participated in the study, which was concluded after the second round. Consensus was reached on all dimensions and categories in the CLIQ framework: informativeness (accuracy, completeness, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, and relevance), availability (accessibility, portability, security, and timeliness), and usability (conformance, consistency, and maintainability). A new dimension, searchability, was introduced in the availability category to account for the ease of finding needed information in the DHTs. Certain dimensions were renamed, and some definitions were rephrased to improve clarity. CONCLUSIONS: The CLIQ framework reached a high expert consensus and clarity of language relating to the information quality dimensions. The framework can be used by health care managers and institutions as a pragmatic tool for identifying and forestalling information quality problems that could compromise patient safety and quality of care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057430.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tecnologia Digital Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Internet Res Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tecnologia Digital Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Med Internet Res Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido