Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin versus placebo to treat lower respiratory tract infections associated with low procalcitonin: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
Tsalik, Ephraim L; Rouphael, Nadine G; Sadikot, Ruxana T; Rodriguez-Barradas, Maria C; McClain, Micah T; Wilkins, Dana M; Woods, Christopher W; Swamy, Geeta K; Walter, Emmanuel B; El Sahly, Hana M; Keitel, Wendy A; Mulligan, Mark J; Tuyishimire, Bonifride; Serti, Elisavet; Hamasaki, Toshimitsu; Evans, Scott R; Ghazaryan, Varduhi; Lee, Marina S; Lautenbach, Ebbing.
Afiliação
  • Tsalik EL; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Emergency Medicine Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic
  • Rouphael NG; Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Sadikot RT; Atlanta VA Health Care System, Atlanta, GA, USA; Medical Service, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
  • Rodriguez-Barradas MC; Infectious Diseases Section, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • McClain MT; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Medical Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Wilkins DM; bioMérieux, Durham, NC, USA; Rho, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Woods CW; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Medical Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Swamy GK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Walter EB; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • El Sahly HM; Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Keitel WA; Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Mulligan MJ; Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Tuyishimire B; Emmes Company, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Serti E; Emmes Company, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Hamasaki T; Biostatistics Center, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Evans SR; Biostatistics Center, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Ghazaryan V; Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Lee MS; Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Lautenbach E; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Clinical Epi
Lancet Infect Dis ; 23(4): 484-495, 2023 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525985
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lower respiratory tract infections are frequently treated with antibiotics, despite a viral cause in many cases. It remains unknown whether low procalcitonin concentrations can identify patients with lower respiratory tract infection who are unlikely to benefit from antibiotics. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of azithromycin versus placebo to treat lower respiratory tract infections in patients with low procalcitonin.

METHODS:

We conducted a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at five health centres in the USA. Adults aged 18 years or older with clinically suspected non-pneumonia lower respiratory tract infection and symptom duration from 24 h to 28 days were eligible for enrolment. Participants with a procalcitonin concentration of 0·25 ng/mL or less were randomly assigned (11), in blocks of four with stratification by site, to receive over-encapsulated oral azithromycin 250 mg or matching placebo (two capsules on day 1 followed by one capsule daily for 4 days). Participants, non-study clinical providers, investigators, and study coordinators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was efficacy of azithromycin versus placebo in terms of clinical improvement at day 5 in the intention-to-treat population. The non-inferiority margin was -12·5%. Solicited adverse events (abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhoea, allergic reaction, or yeast infections) were recorded as a secondary outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03341273.

FINDINGS:

Between Dec 8, 2017, and March 9, 2020, 691 patients were assessed for eligibility and 499 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive azithromycin (n=249) or placebo (n=250). Clinical improvement at day 5 was observed in 148 (63%, 95% CI 54 to 71) of 238 participants with full data in the placebo group and 155 (69%, 61 to 77) of 227 participants with full data in the azithromycin group in the intention-to-treat analysis (between-group difference -6%, 95% CI -15 to 2). The 95% CI for the difference did not meet the non-inferiority margin. Solicited adverse events and the severity of solicited adverse events were not significantly different between groups at day 5, except for increased abdominal pain associated with azithromycin (47 [23%, 95% CI 18 to 29] of 204 participants) compared with placebo (35 [16%, 12 to 21] of 221; between-group difference -7% [95% CI -15 to 0]; p=0·066).

INTERPRETATION:

Placebo was not non-inferior to azithromycin in terms of clinical improvement at day 5 in adults with lower respiratory tract infection and a low procalcitonin concentration. After accounting for both the rates of clinical improvement and solicited adverse events at day 5, it is unclear whether antibiotics are indicated for patients with lower respiratory tract infection and a low procalcitonin concentration.

FUNDING:

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, bioMérieux.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Respiratórias / Azitromicina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Respiratórias / Azitromicina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article