Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review and evaluation of statistical methods for group variable selection.
Buch, Gregor; Schulz, Andreas; Schmidtmann, Irene; Strauch, Konstantin; Wild, Philipp S.
Afiliação
  • Buch G; Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Schulz A; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany.
  • Schmidtmann I; Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Strauch K; Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Wild PS; Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Stat Med ; 42(3): 331-352, 2023 02 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36546512
ABSTRACT
This review condenses the knowledge on variable selection methods implemented in R and appropriate for datasets with grouped features. The focus is on regularized regressions identified through a systematic review of the literature, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 14 methods are discussed, most of which use penalty terms to perform group variable selection. Depending on how the methods account for the group structure, they can be classified into knowledge and data-driven approaches. The first encompass group-level and bi-level selection methods, while two-step approaches and collinearity-tolerant methods constitute the second category. The identified methods are briefly explained and their performance compared in a simulation study. This comparison demonstrated that group-level selection methods, such as the group minimax concave penalty, are superior to other methods in selecting relevant variable groups but are inferior in identifying important individual variables in scenarios where not all variables in the groups are predictive. This can be better achieved by bi-level selection methods such as group bridge. Two-step and collinearity-tolerant approaches such as elastic net and ordered homogeneity pursuit least absolute shrinkage and selection operator are inferior to knowledge-driven methods but provide results without requiring prior knowledge. Possible applications in proteomics are considered, leading to suggestions on which method to use depending on existing prior knowledge and research question.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Simulação por Computador Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Stat Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Simulação por Computador Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Stat Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha