Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomarkers of Migraine and Cluster Headache: Differences and Similarities.
Messina, Roberta; Sudre, Carole H; Wei, Diana Y; Filippi, Massimo; Ourselin, Sebastien; Goadsby, Peter J.
Afiliação
  • Messina R; Division of Neuroscience, Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Milan, Italy.
  • Sudre CH; Neurology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  • Wei DY; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Filippi M; King's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
  • Ourselin S; NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Goadsby PJ; Division of Neuroscience, Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Milan, Italy.
Ann Neurol ; 93(4): 729-742, 2023 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36565271
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study was undertaken to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers that differentiate migraine from cluster headache patients and imaging features that are shared.

METHODS:

Clinical, functional, and structural MRI data were obtained from 20 migraineurs, 20 cluster headache patients, and 15 healthy controls. Support vector machine algorithms and a stepwise removal process were used to discriminate headache patients from controls, and subgroups of patients. Regional between-group differences and association between imaging features and patients' clinical characteristics were also investigated.

RESULTS:

The accuracy for classifying headache patients from controls was 80%. The classification accuracy for discrimination between migraine and controls was 89%, and for cluster headache and controls it was 98%. For distinguishing cluster headache from migraine patients, the MRI classifier yielded an accuracy of 78%, whereas MRI-clinical combined classification model achieved an accuracy of 99%. Bilateral hypothalamic and periaqueductal gray (PAG) functional networks were the most important MRI features in classifying migraine and cluster headache patients from controls. The left thalamic network was the most discriminative MRI feature in classifying migraine from cluster headache patients. Compared to migraine, cluster headache patients showed decreased functional interaction between the left thalamus and cortical areas mediating interoception and sensory integration. The presence of restlessness was the most important clinical feature in discriminating the two groups of patients.

INTERPRETATION:

Functional biomarkers, including the hypothalamic and PAG networks, are shared by migraine and cluster headache patients. The thalamocortical pathway may be the neural substrate that differentiates migraine from cluster headache attacks with their distinct clinical features. ANN NEUROL 2023;93729-742.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cefaleia Histamínica / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Neurol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cefaleia Histamínica / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Neurol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália