Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient education information material assessment criteria: A scoping review.
Ahmadzadeh, Khadijeh; Bahrami, Masoud; Zare-Farashbandi, Firoozeh; Adibi, Payman; Boroumand, Mohammad Ali; Rahimi, Alireza.
Afiliação
  • Ahmadzadeh K; Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Bahrami M; Student Research Commitee, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran.
  • Zare-Farashbandi F; Department of Adult Health Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Adibi P; Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Boroumand MA; Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Rahimi A; Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Health Info Libr J ; 40(1): 3-28, 2023 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637218
BACKGROUND: Patient education information material (PEIM) is an essential component of patient education programs in increasing patients' ability to cope with their diseases. Therefore, it is essential to consider the criteria that will be used to prepare and evaluate these resources. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to identify these criteria and recognize the tools or methods used to evaluate them. METHODS: National and international databases and indexing banks, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, the Cochrane Library, Magiran, SID and ISC, were searched for this review. Original or review articles, theses, short surveys, and conference papers published between January 1990 and June 2022 were included. RESULTS: Overall, 4688 documents were retrieved, of which 298 documents met the inclusion criteria. The criteria were grouped into 24 overarching criteria. The most frequently used criteria were readability, quality, suitability, comprehensibility and understandability. CONCLUSION: This review has provided empirical evidence to identify criteria, tools, techniques or methods for developing or evaluating a PEIM. The authors suggest that developing a comprehensive tool based on these findings is critical for evaluating the overall efficiency of PEIM using effective criteria.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação de Pacientes como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Info Libr J Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação de Pacientes como Assunto Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Info Libr J Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã