Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differential COVID-19 infection rates in children, adults, and elderly: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 38 pre-vaccination national seroprevalence studies.
Axfors, Cathrine; Pezzullo, Angelo Maria; Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina G; Apostolatos, Alexandre; Ioannidis, John Pa.
Afiliação
  • Axfors C; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Pezzullo AM; Department for Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Apostolatos A; Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Ioannidis JP; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
J Glob Health ; 13: 06004, 2023 Jan 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36655924
ABSTRACT

Background:

Debate exists about whether extra protection of elderly and other vulnerable individuals is feasible in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the relative infection rates in the elderly vs the non-elderly and, secondarily, in children vs adults.

Methods:

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of seroprevalence studies conducted in the pre-vaccination era. We identified representative national studies without high risk of bias through SeroTracker and PubMed searches (last updated May 17, 2022). We noted seroprevalence estimates for children, non-elderly adults, and elderly adults, using cut-offs of 20 and 60 years (or as close to these ages, if they were unavailable) and compared them between different age groups.

Results:

We included 38 national seroprevalence studies from 36 different countries comprising 826 963 participants. Twenty-six of these studies also included pediatric populations and twenty-five were from high-income countries. The median ratio of seroprevalence in elderly vs non-elderly adults (or non-elderly in general, if pediatric and adult population data were not offered separately) was 0.90-0.95 in different analyses, with large variability across studies. In five studies (all in high-income countries), we observed significant protection of the elderly with a ratio of <0.40, with a median of 0.83 in high-income countries and 1.02 elsewhere. The median ratio of seroprevalence in children vs adults was 0.89 and only one study showed a significant ratio of <0.40. The main limitation of our study is the inaccuracies and biases in seroprevalence studies.

Conclusions:

Precision shielding of elderly community-dwelling populations before the availability of vaccines was indicated in some high-income countries, but most countries failed to achieve any substantial focused protection. Registration Open Science Framework (available at https//osf.io/xvupr).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Child / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Child / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos