Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Protocol for the TRANSLATE prospective, multicentre, randomised clinical trial of prostate biopsy technique.
Bryant, Richard J; Yamamoto, Hide; Eddy, Ben; Kommu, Sashi; Narahari, Krishna; Omer, Altan; Leslie, Tom; Catto, James W F; Rosario, Derek J; Good, Daniel W; Gray, Rob; Liew, Matthew P C; Lopez, J Francisco; Campbell, Teresa; Reynard, John M; Tuck, Steve; Barber, Vicki S; Medeghri, Nadjat; Davies, Lucy; Parkes, Matthew; Hewitt, Aimi; Landeiro, Filipa; Wolstenholme, Jane; Macpherson, Ruth; Verrill, Clare; Marian, Ioana R; Williams, Roxanne; Hamdy, Freddie C; Lamb, Alastair D.
Afiliação
  • Bryant RJ; Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Yamamoto H; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Eddy B; Department of Urology, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, UK.
  • Kommu S; Department of Urology, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Canterbury, UK.
  • Narahari K; Department of Urology, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Canterbury, UK.
  • Omer A; Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Leslie T; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, University Hospital, Coventry, UK.
  • Catto JWF; Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Rosario DJ; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Good DW; Department of Urology, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes Hospital, Milton Keynes, UK.
  • Gray R; Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield and Department of Urology, Sheffield University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
  • Liew MPC; Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield and Department of Urology, Sheffield University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
  • Lopez JF; Department of Urology, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Campbell T; Department of Urology, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Wycombe Hospital, High Wycombe, UK.
  • Reynard JM; Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK.
  • Tuck S; Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Barber VS; Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Medeghri N; Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Davies L; Oxfordshire Prostate Cancer Support Group, Oxford, UK.
  • Parkes M; Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Hewitt A; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Landeiro F; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Wolstenholme J; Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Macpherson R; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Verrill C; Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Marian IR; Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Williams R; Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Hamdy FC; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Lamb AD; Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
BJU Int ; 131(6): 694-704, 2023 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36695816
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

objectives:

to determine whether local anaesthetic transperineal prostate (LATP) biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group ≥2 disease (i.e., any Gleason pattern 4 disease), compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy, in biopsy-naïve men undergoing biopsy based on suspicion of csPCa. SECONDARY

OBJECTIVES:

to compare (i) infection rates, (ii) health-related quality of life, (iii) patient-reported procedure tolerability, (iv) patient-reported biopsy-related complications (including bleeding, bruising, pain, loss of erectile function), (v) number of subsequent prostate biopsy procedures required, (vi) cost-effectiveness, (vii) other histological parameters, and (viii) burden and rate of detection of clinically insignificant PCa (ISUP Grade Group 1 disease) in men undergoing these two types of prostate biopsy. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

The TRANSLATE trial is a UK-wide, multicentre, randomised clinical trial that meets the criteria for level-one evidence in diagnostic test evaluation. TRANSLATE is investigating whether LATP biopsy leads to a higher rate of detection of csPCa compared to TRUS prostate biopsy. Both biopsies are being performed with an average of 12 systematic cores in six sectors (depending on prostate size), plus three to five target cores per multiparametric/bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging lesion. LATP biopsy is performed using an ultrasound probe-mounted needle-guidance device (either the 'Precision-Point' or BK UA1232 system). TRUS biopsy is performed according to each hospital's standard practice. The study is 90% powered to detect a 10% difference (LATP biopsy hypothesised at 55% detection rate for csPCa vs 45% for TRUS biopsy). A total of 1042 biopsy-naïve men referred with suspected PCa need to be recruited.

CONCLUSIONS:

This trial will provide robust prospective data to determine the diagnostic ability of LATP biopsy vs TRUS biopsy in the primary diagnostic setting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido